SteeleRedux You are just as big a liar as paul1405.

1st You wrote Quote "And blokes like Philip S will faithfully regurgitate my anti GW rantings as fact because that is what useful 'idiots' are for"

** SteeleRedux Notice you claim "I will regurgitate my anti GW rantings" in other words I have to repeat what YOU say about GW.

2nd I replied. Please show me where this has been done?

3rd You claim Quote "Come on young chap, you know perfectly well you reproduced Mr Derrick's rubbish quote. If I must here it is again;"

“Despite a 68 - year gap in data from 1791 to 1859, we conclude that there has been NO significant change in Max and Min temperature trends at the Sydney Observatory station for at least a period of 226 years, from 1788 to 2018.”

** You claim I copied the above text from YOU.

4th Posted by Philip S, Thursday, 17 January 2019 1:09:44 PM (3rd comment from top)
"Despite a 68 - year gap in data from 1791 to 1859, we conclude that there has been NO significant change in Max and Min temperature trends at the Sydney Observatory station for at least a period of 226 years, from 1788 to 2018."

5th Posted by Philip S, Thursday, 17 January 2019 1:16:18 PM (on another thread)
"Gee Belly this absolutely demolishes your statement about the temperatures "No science needed here just walk out the door"

Despite a 68 - year gap in data from 1791 to 1859, we conclude that there has been NO significant change in Max and Min temperature trends at the Sydney Observatory station for at least a period of 226 years, from 1788 to 2018."

6th You did not post that comment till
Posted by SteeleRedux, Thursday, 17 January 2019 2:45:37 PM (6th comment from top)

So you show me where you have posted that statement prior to the two times I posted it.
Thursday, 17 January 2019 1:09:44 PM (3rd comment from top)
and
Thursday, 17 January 2019 1:16:18 PM

If not you are a liar.

SteeleRedux
** You copied part of my post and claimed it was yours the timestamps tell the true story. **

SR,

"I provide links. "

Yes I well recall all those links you provided to show that the US had 12000 troops in South Korea and no nukes and that the Chinese were moving 150000 troops to the NK border etc etc.

Since you clearly can't Google "Gergis et al 2012" I'll give you a link to get started....

http://climateaudit.org/2016/07/21/joelle-gergis-data-torturer/

I look forward to you telling me that Climate Audit is a 'denier' site and therefore wrong. Have fun with the statistical jargon,

"Until then all they are is unsubstantiated guff."

Yep, if you don't want it to be true, it isn't.

"If not you are a liar".

'Liar' is the default for the Three Sneerers, Philip. They run their own mini fake news operation.

What has Australia done to itself, with its climate change hysteria and killing of industry with very expensive, unreliable electricity and mania about carbon dioxide?

According to the Brookings Institute Australia will do badly on just about everything: Gross Domestic Product, jobs, investment and in a fall in the value of the dollar. Australia is the biggest loser in the world, along with Russia and Opec, while our sacrifices to climate change won’t change the climate at all

Dear mhaze,

See mate providing a link wasn't all that hard was it.

I do remember our Korean exchange, it was highly entertaining. Lol.

Of course Climate Audit is a denier site. It is run by a bloke with no climate training but rather a “mining exploration company director, a former minerals prospector and semi-retired mining consultant”.

However I have absolutely no issue with he and others on the site reviewing climate papers. These have become some of the most pawed over publications in science precisely because there are highly motivated agenda driven people prepared to put in thousands of hours of unpaid work dissecting their methods, results and conclusions.

Your link is a perfect example. Nearly a staggering 6,000 words on our poor Joelle. Possibly could have done without the over 50 times the word torture or torturer was used but hey, when efforts like this serve to challenge and add further robustness to the science even in a small way as this appears to have done then all to the good.

And you are correct, a fair whack of the statistical analysis presented was out of my comfort zone. If you yourself are professing greater knowledge in that field then you will of course have an opinion on a quote from yet another mineral explorer presented to us by the erstwhile Philip S.

“Despite a 68 - year gap in data from 1791 to 1859, we conclude that there has been NO significant change in Max and Min temperature trends at the Sydney Observatory station for at least a period of 226 years, from 1788 to 2018.”

Do you think this was a robust or even just a reasonable conclusion given the data available?

Here is the paper?

http://saltbushclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/comparison-of-first-fleet-and-modern-temperatures.pd