Do you think companies like Oh My Woodeness! who make 'eco-sunglasses' are actually helping the environment or destroying it like every other fashion brand?

Plum welcome, did you see on social media a story from feminists, thankfully in another country that feminists should not eat eggs?
TRUE eating eggs it says is anti feminist
Now such dills exist
Hence this thread, some greens just like some anti greens, are dills
However are you pulling our leg?
Or one of your own?

Greens ban wood-chips for paper which blocked the Abbott-Morrison-Soros boat people from reading about submarines. Labor funneled taxes to France and forced Libs to pay about 36 or 50 or more billions or the boats will stop. The Lib Minister for Boats says money doesn't grow on trees and gave 1/2million to barrier reef boats. These are not submarines thank goodness.

1/2 billion barrier reef. Same thing. In the red because of greens.

But just for your edification here is a list of major bushfires in Australia since settlement. Note there is not one Queensland fire which made the list.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushfires_in_Australia

Posted by SteeleRedux, Tuesday, 4 December 2018 8:50:40 PM

Don't worry Steely, now we have Labour in government we have greatly reduced our fuel reduction burns. Buys green preferences don't you know.

It may take a few years, but we should have similar ridiculous levels of fuel in our forests soon. Then just watch our fires. Probably a fair way to go in self destruction as practised in California forests, but on the way.

We are getting there in terms of laws too. This Labor government is going around declaring private property as private open space. The owners still have to pay the rates, but aren't allowed to do anything on it, not even clear the fallen timber that is giving them a private fire hazard.

Evidently this stuff is good breeding habitat for little critters. Lets them breed up so we can burn more of them in these fires. Typical green logic.

We are not quite at the stage where we fine people who clear the trees close to their homes, [other than in those private open spaces], to reduce fire hazard, but give the lefty/greens time & we'll get there too.

As I said, knowing you are a Victorian tells us much.

Belly, "Is Mise know the road well like Hasbeen drive a bit quick [based on his past posts]"

Yes Belly, I have driven a bit quick. How about 182 MILES/hour down Conrod straight Bathurst, the year I won the Gold Star Formula 1 race there in the Brabham Repco. Didn't like it much to be honest, 160 mph is about as quick as was safe in those 1960s open wheelers really.

One of the beauties of doing things like that is that it removes any interest in driving fast, as compared to reasonably quickly, on public roads.

One of the reasons for some doing silly speeds on public roads is lack of opportunity to do it in a suitable place, & having an itch they need to scratch. Many countries have track days, where the general public, for not silly costs, can go & get it out of their system, without endangering anyone but themselves & a few others doing the same thing.

My car club ran a day at a race track for members to do some fast laps recently. Most did not go too silly, they respect their old classic cars too much for that, but a few did give themselves a bit of a fright, going faster than they are used to.

I went along to help as an organiser, but had no interest in driving. I do own a 150 MPH Honda S2000. I own it because of the way is stops & steers, because it is a nice convertible with an easy electric hood, & as a Honda, very reliable, but mainly because I like driving small convertibles, & wanted to avoid parking my Triumphs in shopping centre car parks. Perhaps you misread some earlier post of mine.