//When someone post at a level that very few understand what the message he or she is trying to give is, evidenced by the lack of replies to the
message does not say much for the poster.//

If you say so, Philip.

But since nobody else seems that exercised about his weird posts, why don't you start your own thread on that subject instead of clogging up every other available thread with your whining?

NOW HEAR THIS! It has been decreed by a power greater than I (my mother-in-law) that henceforth ALL POSTS shall be made only containing words beginning with the letter 'F'. Transgressors of the new edict shall be severely dealt with! Execution will apply in the first instance, and a $10 fine for all subsequent infringements! Got it!

nicknamenick, post whatever you like, and I do read much of what you put up.

words containing letter 'f'.

https://www.thegoblinball.com/the-goblin-blog/category/melbourne-sword-and-spear-association
My personal favourite is the cutlass or sabre. I have a soft spot for pirates, it's true, but I also love how light and quick they are compared to some of the heavier blades, and the fact that they are wielded with a single hand give me freedom to have an of-hand weapon like a dagger, or to have a shield as well.
Private lessons are also being given by trained officers.

So, Vic. Minister for Police Lisa Neville must be changing perp policy. I recommend officers on armoured horses with Victoria coat of Arms , it shows 2 female officers with weapons.

Court Jesters

No they're not . The Supporters are 'supporting' the Shield on either side. The left officer wears a laurel wreath crown and carries a sprig of olive in her hand. The right one has upon her head a circlet of golden cereal, and with her exterior hand supports a Cornucopia.

Olive wood is used for high-end knife or tool handles. Hercules wrestled with the river god Achelous and wrenched off one of his bull horns which became the cornucopia.

<<You still haven't explained why it is wrong to use a gun, or any other lethal weapon, in the legal defence of one's own life or the life of others.>>

I don't have to, because Is Mise, you are only looking at the issue from a legal perspective.

There is no focus on the matter from a moral or ethical perspective, which is very important.

I say this in the context, that a legal focus, won't provide any benefit to anyone affected by the impacts of gun violence, or in fact any violence. Talk one day to victims of such violence and you may understand.

Law will never provide one with a feeling of betterment, but a social, ethical and even (for some) a religious focus on life has a higher chance of achieving something enriching, leading to perhaps less violence in the community, that law simply cannot and simply never will.