This compact has been around the UN since 2016.

The U.S and Hungary are the only two Western countries to refuse to sign it (non-Western countries wouldn’t be asked), and while Immigration Minister Dutton told Alan Jones that Australia would not sign it “in its present form”, Australia was part of the cabal that came up with this compact that would give ultimate control of our borders to the United Nations.

This week’s Spectator editorial describes this compact as putting Australia on the threshold of “another great betrayal to mirror the Paris Accord”.

The Spectator muses that Dutton could be replaced by a Turnbull acolyte, or, a future ALP government would sign up saying that they were just ratifying a Turnbull-era policy.

The work done by Abbott, Morrison and Dutton could be swept away as “carelessly” as were cheap energy prices - all in the name of the “we signed up to it, so we stick to it” attitude that they used to excuse the Paris Accord betrayal.

Is the text of this UN treaty available anywhere ?
Looking what the situation with the UN Human Rights body with Islamic
countries in the majority control, I would expect this border control
to go the same way.

There's more on the web. Here's just one:

http://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact

Bazz,

Just Google the title.

My only post in such a thread is this one to reward xenophobia with such a thing if it exists is insanity, and will never happen

A couple of polls from the week just gone: 72% of Australians want immigration cut, and only 38% are in favour of staying in the Paris Accord. More evidence that both Liberal and Labor are betraying us.

CRIME RATE IN THE U.K. SOARS WHILE 90% OF RECORDED CRIME GOES UNCHARGED

http://www.blacklistednews.com/article/67386/crime-rate-in-the-uk-soars-while-90-of-recorded-crime-goes.html

Homicide and crime rates – including sexual assaults, and knife and gun attacks – continue to rise in the United Kingdom, with 90% of recorded offenses not ending in charges.

A report published last week lays bare the shocking numbers – crimes resulting in charges sat at 11%, with the percentage falling two points in just a year to 9%; down from 15% in 2015.

Since March of this year and the 12 months before, only 443,000 crimes out of 4.6 million recorded resulted in charges.

Earlier this year, the homicide rate in London overtook New York City – with knife attacks rising by more than 30%. Although crime rates are surging in the U.K.,officer numbers in London have hit a record low.

As it stands, fewer than 1 in 10 of recorded crimes result in a charge, doing little to abate fear that England is undergoing an epidemic of violent crime.

“High-harm” violent offenses involving weapons have soared – with knife, gun, and homicide rates rising rapidly.

Official figures reported by the Office for National Statistics detail that – even excluding incidents with multiple victims, such as the terror attacks in London or Manchester – homicides rose 12% from 74 to 701 in just the span of a year.

At the beginning of the year, after four young men were murdered in separate knife attacks in London during New Year’s Eve celebrations, mayor Sadiq Khan said:

I am doing everything I can to tackle this scourge in our communities. Keeping the country safe should be the Government’s priority too, and it is time ministers stopped shirking this responsibility…

Before being elected in 2016, Khan promised to “challenge gang culture and knife crime head on”.

However, it comes as no surprise Khan attempted to place the blame elsewhere after making comments claiming that terrorism is “part and parcel of living in a big city”.

** The last sentence is pure BS there are hundreds of big cities that have nowhere near the problems. **

It is interesting how London's increase in violence coincides with the election of a Muslim Lord Mayor and the cringing political correctness of the Metropolitan Police.

To Ttbn- I expect similar occurrences for the future. I guess we can just surround ourselves with like minded people and stay in our homes and protect each other and our families. There are those that attack others in the name of the right- there are those that harm themselves in the name of the right. Why is it the right?

Australia will not be Australian for long.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6005137/More-newborn-babies-children-immigrant-mothers.html

Almost HALF of all newborns are now the children of immigrant mothers - with the number of babies with Australian-born parents at record lows

The number of children born to immigrant women is rising across the nation
41 per cent of babies are born to foreign mothers in WA and 38 per cent in NSW
Yet babies born to Australian-born women have decreased by 10 per cent
Women from Lebanon had the highest birthrate of foreign-born mothers

More than 40 per cent of newborn babies are born to foreign mothers in one Australian state, as the numbers of children born to immigrants rise across the nation.

The two most popular migrant mothers giving birth in Australia are those of Indian and Chinese descent, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

In the last ten years there has been a staggering 236 per cent increase in the number of Indian-born mothers giving birth in Australia and 159 per cent rise in Chinese-born women, The Telegraph reports.

Women from Lebanon had the most children out of foreign-born mothers with an average of 4.03 children per woman.

While the number of children born to immigrant parents has increased, this figure has dropped for Australian women giving birth.

Babies born to Australian women decreased by 10 per cent in the same ten-year period.

CM,

I fear we will go the same way as the UK if history follows along the lines it always has. I have always been something of an Anglophile, and two thirds of my ancestry is British, but the UK is, in my view, finished. Multiculturalism is lunacy - cultural suicide. All cultures are NOT equal, and they should not be lumped together.

To Ttbn- Well we can't do anything about it by ourselves and if the Australian population are too late to do anything about it then at least we can say we tried to preserve our culture. Interesting that it does seem to satisfy the UN definition of genocide. Like I've said before it's one of the tools in the toolkit and the Socialists appear to have made good use of it. Looks like the western world is to be dominated by the Indian's and Chinese where women and the poor are supported by humane policies, where population is responsibly managed. I just don't understand how our intelligent leaders have missed this. The business community is going to be dominated by foreign companies and I've noticed more activity in this domain. With the end of the western world I wonder how long the UN will last. If the Australian people don't do something soon it will be too late. There are still things we can do if we act now. We need to vote in anti-immigration in the senate- these people will then have the ability to block supply and law and force the major parties to support the Australian people rather than their own interests. At this point if the major parties don't change they will be destroyed. Then the new found strength in the anti-immigration parties can solidify their position by capturing Australian electorates. We will need allies with other western Anglo/ European countries in order to balance the pressure from Asia. There may be some countries that will fall (such as the UK sadly) to Asia (India and China). It looks as if nuclear weapons will be the last defense to protect our cultures survival.
There are other technologies that stand to threaten the balance such as computer, space technology, etc. If we can reform the UN there is a small hope of avoiding disaster

To Philip S- Informative post. Thanks.

Despite Dutton saying that the Turnbull regime would not sign the Compact, Turbull still refuses to rule out signing it.

A comment on the news tonight that the compact has rules against new
media talking against immigration. No details yet.

How about Australians all move to Queensland and rename it Australia ?

According to The Australian newspaper -

A government source said it was not considering
dropping out altogether at this stage and that it
was possible to sign up with "reservations" about
the text. There was a fair amount of time before
December when the signing ceremony will take place.

What Mr Turnbull said was, "We are examining the
agreement, we will NEVER sign up to anything that
diminishes, or undermines, or limits our ability to
keep Australia safe."

Just heard a criticism of the compact on tv.
Apparently it would require the government to force news services to
take positive attitudes to immigration matters.
The same would also apply to judicial officers.
I have the document here so will go searching through it.

Bazz,

Given the media's current attitude to immigration, they are likely to be cheer leaders for the Compact without any encouragement or pressure. I would like to see what you have heard/seen if that is possible.

Australian Conservatives are totally against this Compact, saying that Turnbull and Bishop are globalists who would have Australia taking orders from the UN.