mhaze,

No. you don't get it at all.

Kindly do not put words into my mouth.
Read what I actually did say - not your own interpretation
of what you thought I said.

I do not Google media sources according
to my political inclinations. I would find that extremely
narrow and rigid and to be honest very slanted in outlook.

I search by subject (or issues). Therefore I do
not choose the link according to my/their political agenda-
for example -
like PJ Media, et al, that you presented recently - which
were all conservative media outlets.

The link I gave you in my previous post was taken from -
"The Business Insider," which is an American financial
business and news website which operates with editions in
various countries including the Netherlands. I found it
useful, because it presented the views of the Pentagon
and it referred to the disconnect between the US President's
rhetoric and his administration's policies that this recent
money from the Pentagon highlighted.

The article simply stated facts. However, I must admit
that it is hard to continue
a conversation with anyone when all they try to do is put
you down instead of addressing the issue at hand.

Hi Foxy,
"Western analysts do not consider Russia a democracy. How could they? Putin controls all the media and television outlets and any opposition is virtually invisible. Human rights organisations and activists have accused Putin of persecuting political critics and activists as well as ordering them tortured or assassinated."

That right there is where your ignorant and foolish.
Did I or did I not say 'first you must understand the regime change script'?
That the 'so called free and independent media is a part of that script'?

The Regime Change Script goes like this:

Step 1/ Fund civil-rights groups and stir up civil unrest. Get them to protest against the incumbent government including damage to public property and clashes with police and government officials.

- Force Government to respond, and have your own 5th column media report on it as well -

Step 2. Create a situation where you can deliberately and with bias report the government's actions in a bad light, with the specific aim of forcing the government to act against that media organisation.

Step 3.
Once government has moved against the so-called 'free and independent media', they will lose more legitimacy, can be labelled a 'regime' and western media will also report on it, giving the protesters and that 'evil regime' international coverage.

It's a school play.

There's ways you can modify or build on it, like 'open borders' - If we don't have protestors import them, they will vote for your team, and 'accuse government of corruption and mistreatment of citizens'

- socialist policies and gripes of the left -

Your 'democracy' is a recipe to have back-doors built-in that allow the nation to be subverted and undermined by foreigners.

You serve elites and their plans for One World Government.

Putin's democracy is one where he has closed those back-doors, 'foolproofed' one might say and protects his nation and people from the absolute carnage that the US routinely inflicts on other nations.

In Putin's Annual Q&A session, regular citizens call in and discuss issues with the nations leader.
Do we have this? Why not?
http://youtu.be/JFyfu9um_Ts

Trump's former lawyer, once the apple of Trump's eye it seems is yet another who has fallen in the great buffoons bad books, by recording him admitting he needed to pay off yet another female, again if this was about Obama we would see a shark feeding frenzy against the very thing Trump's supporters are defending here life can be fun

Once again, the real fools prove to be Belly and his cohort of lefty idiots.

AC,

Please do not address any more posts to me.

I will not be reading or responding to them.

I suspect that you're a Russian troll.

AC,

You continue to address as many posts to Mother Russia as you wish to. If you look through her list of rantings you will find her lecture to me on how she will do as she pleases. She spits the dummy every time anyone betters her. The next thing will be her whining about how she is thinking of leaving OLO. We should be so lucky! You can see and hear her brand of shrieking on the ABC any day of the week. I only read her snarl at you because it was uncharacteristically much shorter than her usual Google diatribes, interspersed with takles of mummy and nursing homes.