The Forum > General Discussion > What is your view for one to worship humans?
What is your view for one to worship humans?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The people leaving Trump's staff are all people he appointed. The president's staff is selected by the president. The great turnover of staff is not a 'draining of the swamp', but a failure of Trump to get along with people he appointed. In government, unlike his private affairs, he has appointed some highly qualified people.
Conscientious, highly qualified people will be likely to disagree with him on some issues. He apparently would be more comfortable associating with people who always agree with him. That makes them useless in case he makes a bad decision.
He appears to get along well with dictators or authoritarian figures like Kim il Sung, Duterte or Putin. He alienates allies like Trudeau, Macron or Merkel. One area in which I think Obama was good was his environmental regulations. Trunp has appointed Pruitt who is a swamp creature as administrator of the EPA:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Pruitt
Pruitt rejects the scientific consensus that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are a primary contributor to climate change.
By May 2018, Pruitt was under at least 12 separate investigations by the Government Accountability Office, the E.P.A. inspector general, the White House Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, and two House committees over his spending habits, conflicts of interests, extreme secrecy, and management practices. Pruitt made frequent use of first class travel as well as frequent charter and military flights. As EPA administrator, Pruitt leased a condo in Washington D.C. at a deeply discounted rate from a lobbyist whose clients were regulated by the EPA. Pruitt further caused ethics concerns by circumventing the White House and using a narrow provision of the Safe Drinking Water Act to autonomously give raises to his two closest aides of approximately $28,000 and $57,000 each, which were substantially higher than salaries paid to those in similar positions in the Obama administration, and which allowed both to avoid signing conflicts of interest pledges. By June 2018, amid a steady succession of revelations of misconduct, a growing chorus of conservatives had begun suggesting that Pruitt should resign.
Draining a swamp?