OzSpen: In being a "happy clapper" your colleague is in good company with the Psalmist who wrote, 'Come, everyone! Clap your hands! Shout to God with joyful praise!'

Sing, "Fa hee's a jolly good fellar, fa hee's a jolly good fella, & so say all of uus, & so say all of uss sus, sus... fa hee's a jolly good fell...la, & so say all of uss!" There ya go. We all can be happy Clappers.

Now where can I read your dissertation? Or, is that just more BS from a BAC.

OzSpen,

You wrote to Jayb about his denigrating your 5 years of work
on your thesis because you say this is due to the fact that it
does not agree with his views -
yet you denigrate Thiering's 20 years work - because it doesn't
agree with your views. It seems to me that there's a double
standard here

Jayb,

You have committed the Appeal to Ridicule Fallacy: 'Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument or the use of exaggeration', https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/42/Appeal-to-Ridicule

I will not continue interaction with you as your fallacies prevent our having a coherent discussion.

<<Now where can I read your dissertation? Or, is that just more BS from a BAC.>>

I will NOT give a link to you as you attack my integrity with your ad hominem fallacy.

Bye, bye!

No, Foxy.

<<yet you denigrate Thiering's 20 years work - because it doesn't
agree with your views. It seems to me that there's a double
standard here>>

I reject Thiering's conclusions because of her improper 'pesher' methodology that caused her to invent her conclusion and dump it on the text - rather than getting the meaning from the text.

I found her to be a dishonest researcher in what she did to deny the fundamentals of the Christian faith and still want to call herself Christian.

That's deceit, in my understanding.

OzSpen: I will NOT give a link to you as you attack my integrity with your ad hominem fallacy.

Called out & failed. Typical "Born Again Christian" BS. Now nobody will give you any credence.

Thanks Foxy. You are so right.

OzSpen: I found her to be a dishonest researcher in what she did to deny the fundamentals of the Christian faith and still want to call herself Christian. That's deceit, in my understanding.

It's not deceit. Thiering investigated the fundamentals of the Christian Faith & found them wanting. She wrote about her findings which causes debate. Something that all good Researches & Writers do.

As you have produced a Paper, you should allow it to be debated. If you can't do that then one would have to assume the Paper was produced with a built in Bias towards a BAC point of view to start with. Therefore it would be considered worthless by General Academic Standards. I assume your Dissertation was assessed fellow BAC Academics with similar Biases. Not good practice.