individual, the following link may be of use to you:
http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?docid=AID/AID2001318/00001

Must be more to this than you are telling us individual, on the face of it based on what you say it just can not be that way surely

individual,

It never hurts to get another opinion.

Here's one that should make anyone not vote for the either of the majors.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jun/30/pay-rise-for-politicians-as-penalty-rates-trimmed-further-in-hospitality-and-retail

Aidan & Foxy,
Thank you for your input. But, just to give you a picture on how these work I'll drag out an incident from about 12 -15 years ago.
The same vermin who robbed me years later, smashed the Police Senior Serheant's front door & then pelted his not very old 4-wheel drive with rocks & sticks. Now, being the top cop in town so to speak one would think he just had to get the insurance to sort it out. Think again. The insurance turned around & stated that living in an indigenous community renders insurance invalid. My insurance gave me a laptop after about nine months to the value of $1500 in place of two $4500 computers. When i told them to just put the money into my account because I had already bought a new computer they said, either you accept the laptop or you get nothing, we do not pay out money. When the Police asked the culprit if he had stolen my gear he denied it & therefore the Police said the case was closed.

individual even here you let your view block your ability to see a truth, it is a one sided view that wage cuts are good for the economy, such cuts will be reviewed if the other side wins, if an economy needs cheap wages, then lets some refuse to pay award rates, to thrive our economic future is doomed,the chances of other than the two making up the two party preferred being elected is zero, what do we want out of our economy/community? if it needs to create wealth then why is poverty a side result? blaming the poor for being poor is not an option