cont'd ...

Again - a typo. Here's the link again:

http://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-narrowly-in-favor-of-colorado-baker-in-same-sex-wedding-case-620661

Foxy,

So no errors of fact then?

Why did you admonish me to get my facts straight if they already were straight?

mhaze,

I'm only human after-all.

Dear Foxy,

«The issues are more complex than what you're suggesting»

Even more? What I suggested is not complex enough?

Even as I suggested, this is beyond the ability of any court to decide, so if it is yet more complex as you say, then how dare we throw this at the helpless courts?

Whatever they decide over this impossible task, is going to depend more on the weather than on anything of substance!

"I'm only human after-all."

Well if being 'only human' is getting facts utterly wrong (SCOTUS enforced training) and failing to acknowledge the error when its pointed out, while admonishing others to get THEIR facts right when they are already right (but inconvenient) then I'd agree you're very human.

mhaze,

Thank You - that's very generous of you.
A true gentleman.