"I doubt he would refuse to bake a cake for a second or third marriage, though, and if this is the case, then it is yet another example of the hypocrisy in this whole sorry saga."

By all means let's decide what his views would be under various hypotheticals and then criticise him for those views. As I understand it, his particular sect doesn't oppose divorce. Few do.

Can I point out that he had previously said he'd refused to do cakes that had an anti-LGBT message.

But let's ignore that....it doesn't suit the narrative.

You are free to decide what the views of others are, mhaze, just as you are free to ignore details that are inconvenient to your narrative. I won't be joining you in either instance.

"You are free to decide what the views of others are"

Yes I know I free to do it.

I just choose not to since its fruitless in terms of the search for truth.

At least I try not to.

That’s good to hear, mhaze.

<<I just choose not to [decide what the views of others are] since its fruitless in terms of the search for truth.>>

Perhaps you should tell that to someone who sounds like they are in need of such advice?

<<At least I try not to.>>

Hmm, it looks like you might need to try a little harder.

In this day and age with the web the boys should just have advertised on social media that the cake man won't make em for consenting same sex adults who want to marry. Meanwhile, why can't the religious just own up and admit they are bigots. It's got nothing to do with any god - it's about ignorance and discrimination and using religion to justify it. Psychopathic god, that one.

What they have to decide in the US Courts is whether
a person's religious convictions take precedence
over anti-discrimination laws. That has not been dealt
with - especially as far a businesses are concerned.