I know nobody wants to address the political implications of the Mandela Effect, but we must.

I thought at first it was just about depopulation. Drive everyone crazy and see how many off themselves.

But now I've realised it's even worse.
What are the most contentious political agendas today that modify reality?
Multiculturalism/immigration and globalism. Both dramatically altering existing realties.

But wait, there's more: The end goal of all this is a deracialized, borderless utopia.
That changes the *future*.

But the discordant past will always be there, threatening to revive past identities and social realities.

So the past must be changed to match the future.

Use CERN/quantum computers/whatever tech to slightly edit more and more of history.
Eventually nobody will remember the original facts.

Children raised in a deracialized, borderless utopian world will see museums and history books with deracialised, borderless people. It was "always so".

The intention is supposedly benevolent, but it is ultimately evil.
A "better" world, but a false one. And nobody will know.

Anyone who suggests otherwise is "crazy".

They, it is them who we say never asked us, but just maybe there is a they,UN? who knows we in my life time have seen integration turn to its current, in my view inferior form, is that what they wanted? is this an experiment in one world? maybe, but in truth my concern is that PC supporters will not let us talk about population, surely if nothing else we must talk about containing even putting a cap on population world wide and here in our big dry land

//So the past must be changed to match the future.

Use CERN/quantum computers/whatever tech to slightly edit more and more of history.//

O....kay.

Dear Belly,

You wrote;

“but in truth my concern is that PC supporters will not let us talk about population”

Well I suppose you would lump me in with the PC crowd. And I concede having been away from the forum that you may not have kept up with the opinions of the various posters, but I have repeatedly said I would halve our migration rates tomorrow. We are throttling this country with such high rates while not keeping up with infrastructure. We are doing it to keep economic growth figures positive because they are so dependent on housing developments since manufacturing has declined through disinterested governments.

At the same time I would double our refugee intake. I think most Australians are pretty decent when it comes to supporting people from wartorn countries. However they see their jobs under threat from migrants with high level skill sets and conflate them with refugees. Time to clearly delineate the two.

There are people who feel strongly about halting
immigration. Who see immigrants as problematic.
We certainly need to have this debate.

I agree that we need to examine
the numbers we take in - to ensure
that we have the infrastructure to cope. However
halting immigration altogether - would be disastrous
for our economy (immigrants do work, buy goods and
services - make the economy go round - and pay taxes).
Our population is ageing. We need younger people who
work and can provide us with decent health services,
education, aged care facilities, and so on.
Our universities
rely on foreign students - the universities would
suffer if we were to cut out on the numbers.

Planning long-term and appropriate policies need to
be a focus on our future - and what's viable discussed.

Toni Lavis, why not do a little research before commenting.

The Mandela Effect has been experienced by thousands of people, regarding apparent changes to historical events, people, places, even anatomy and geography.

I don't think it coincidental that most live in the same Western countries experiencing "cultural enrichment".
We are the guinea pigs on all levels.

The ability of modern technology to manipulate space/time/matter combined with quantum computing power means altering history is now possible. That's the how, my post asserts the *why*.

The unification of the world into one raceless, borderless people economically and demographically may produce a utopia, but will always have the cloud of the past hanging over it.

A past of different identities, realities, hostilities.
So why not change the past?

The Mandela Effect is just test runs to see how the tech works and people's reactions.

If your dismissive mockery is typical of most people, the project will succeed.

Most people will just accept whatever changes (however ludicrous) to avoid stress and social estrangment.