Paul, who mentioned expulsion ?
Surely you would not approve Syria being chair of a meeting on chemical weapons ?
Just let them sit there and cop it.
If they gave unsatisfactory explanations then they should not be on that committee.

I agree with Paul on this one.

It is more productive to include Syria in this.
It's only for 4 weeks - and who knows, it may
influence their future behaviour to some extent
if they realise that they are being monitored
internationally, and judged.

How interesting.

Our lefties & greenies all approve of the UN, the most corrupt organisation yet developed by man.

Apparently anything that will further socialism/communism is ok by them, no matter how disastrous it has been for all but the elites.

Useful idiots all.

Goodness me Foxy, they already know they are being monitored but they
do not give a damn about that !
You cannot have a chairman of a meeting being the subject of the meeting discussion.
It just does not work and that is why it is standard practise for such
a chairman to stand down.

Dear Bazz,

I hear what you're saying, however how can you get someone
to stand down when they won't admit to any wrongdoing?
Take Mr Putin and Russia as an example. Look at all the
atrocities they've committed. Yet they still maintain a
place internationally and strive for "respectability" on the
global scene.

Foxy, you do not understand.
They can ONLY defend themselves IF they stand down.
They cannot defend themselves from the chair.
The chairman can rule comments, motions and statements out of order.
Read Roberts rules.
That is why it is a universal rule in ALL organisations.