Steele,

"Then some FNQ slob pulls a weapon and directly intimidates a section of the Australian community and you lot are 'nothing to see here"

The which he did not do, the picture was apparently taken on the range, well before he posted his stupid comment.
He did not directly intimidate anyone with a weapon.

Stop exaggerating.

What is rather strange is the convenience of the threats to the chubby Sarah, methinks I smell a fish, probably one caught on Sea Patrol (or whatever the show was).

SR,

I know that you are trying to deflect from YAM's idiocy, but...

I bet when Dinner Tally phoned the AFP to complain the Commissioner thought "not this F-wit phoning me again?"

Also, GC did not "pull a weapon and directly intimidate" anyone he posted a picture of him firing a weapon at a range and put a caption underneath that would only intimidate someone that got startled by their own shadow. His caption was inappropriate because it was aimed at the left whinge twits that are professionally offended by everything, and would have been offended even if he was pointing a carrot. Even your definition of intimidation does not apply to his caption.

Toni,

For me it was YAM's taxpayer funded trip to countries with some of the worst human rights records, and the worst treatment of women, and returning with glowing reports and the "Islam is most feminist religion" quote that completely shredded her credibility.

That the left whinge offenderatti ignored this but wet themselves over GC's post says it all.

Nicked from another site:

“A Member of Parliament inciting violence against a group of voters should be a sackable offence,” Senator Hanson-Young wrote.

(q)So supporting animal rights groups that threaten violence should result in those members of Parliament being kicked out of office.
Same if they offer support in any way to groups like Hamas.(un-q)

Seems reasonable.

Dear Shadow Minister and Is Mise,

Why are you both being apologists for this bloke?

Here are the different types of threats;

"A direct threat identifies a specific target and is delivered in a straightforward, clear and explicit manner."

"An indirect threat tends to be vague, unclear and ambiguous. The plan, the intended victim, the motivation, and other aspects of the threat are masked or equivocal."

"A veiled threat is one that strongly implies but does not specifically threaten violence."

"A conditional threat is the type of threat often seen in extortion cases. It warns that a violent act will happen unless certain demands or terms are met."

I have sated my case for it being deemed a direct threat, you seem to disagree. Well state your reasons why it shouldn't be.

SR,

"I have sated my case for it being deemed a direct threat"

You shot your bolt too early, your long winded attempt to shoe horn the caption into "intimidation" was pathetic.

Note that it fails miserably on section ii"(that through those actions, you intended the other person to fear physical or mental harm." If you took that to court you would be laughed out.

Dear Shadow Minister,

You really are becoming a bit of a runner aren't you. Lacking anything of substance you pop in, squeeze one of your little pimples, then pop out again.

You in the past have taken me to task talking of the pub test and then come up with its equal, the good old ”If you took that to court you would be laughed out.”

Evidence, argument, logic; all good things to strive for. Why don't you give it a go?

Of course Christensen intended to intimidate. There is no other earthly explanation you could come up with to allow a different take on this so stop being a tool.

A Malaysian politician started unsheathing and then kissing a Malaysian dagger. The Chinese community felt threatened and protested. He apologised.

Quote;

“A senior Malaysian politician has apologized for parading a knife at ruling-party meetings, acknowledging it had upset minority racial communities who later punished the government at elections held last month.
Hishammuddin Hussein, youth-wing leader of main ruling party the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), has for the past several years opened the party’s annual assembly by unsheathing and kissing a traditional Malay dagger, symbol of the party.
Non-Malay communities were uncomfortable with the gesture, especially ethnic Chinese who felt it was aimed at them, a symbol of Malay chauvinism and a reminder of deadly race riots in 1969 when Malays and Chinese attacked each other with knives.
“I apologize if this has affected anybody. I apologize to the non-Malays if they felt afraid of the symbol,”

End quote.

Chritensen's actions were far worse.