Hi Shockadelic,

Brilliant ! You make a number of very relevant points there, and I think I agree enthusiastically with every one of them.

Cheers,

Joe

<<OK, so where is your evidence? Otherwise it is just ad hominem.>>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7FtjtF4gM0

Personally I do consider this as inciting violence (in terms of what it includes) and what may occur after the activity in question.

I know this due to the fact I have been put through similar activity myself, as per below.

Other people strongly objected to the actions (of the other person in question) at a community group meeting I was a member of. The person in question then stopped their verbal abuse. I was nearly in the position of feeling the want to push the person out of their chair at the meeting I was at, as the claims made against myself (for some time) were completely and constantly false.

This included a long letter in a local letter the editor page in a local newspaper attacking myself as an individual. Personally I was shocked, but I did not reply to the letter, generally because I am a very passive person.

To put it simply, I take the view that two wrongs do not make a right.

Nathan J,

I took three minutes out of my day and gave it away after finding NO instance whatsoever of Milo Y inciting violence by anyone. In fact the reverse was true, he obviously abhors violence and has made it his mission to challenge and use his best weapon against it, which is satire and blunter where powerful serial offenders are concerned.

He is a game one, that is for sure.

Definition of substance:

n. the quality of being dependable or stable.
n. the quality of being important, valid, or significant.

I realise that all you devout fanboys believe he possesses the qualities of being important and significant in spades, but you're only fooling yourselves. To many people, he's just an empty vessel making a lot of noise. Those of them who know who he is, anyway. For most people it's more a case of 'sorry, who?' than 'oh, that silly twat' from the Milo-cynics or 'My hero! Isn't he dreamy' from the fanboys.

Nathan,

Milo has never incited violence. To incite violence, you need to actually ask people to commit acts of violence. Stating one's opinions is not incitement.

The only excuse that the left whinge and union thugs have ever needed is that someone says something they disagree with.

Shockadelic,

No, I don’t destroy my own argument.

<<… you destroy your argument by confirming it's "how society expects them to dress and behave" that "distresses" them.>>

Because I also noted “the discomfort of their bodies …”. Society alone doesn't influence that part.

<<So changing your body is not the answer. Changing societal expectations is.>>

Sure, if you ignore my point about the discomfort of their own bodies.

<<Actually age is a spectrum, genius.>>

I know, I never said otherwise. Read what I said again, genius.

<<Children aren't born "gendered".>>

Actually, there are a few biological explanations as to why they can be mentally skewed one way or the other, even before birth. I even provided you with a link explaining these.

<<But nobody who had a penis before puberty has ever had a vagina afterward, by "nature".>>

Agreed. I’m not sure how this discredits anything I have said, though.

I wholeheartedly agree with the rest of what you have to say about sexuality, too. I’m not sure what its relevance was, sorry.

<<And why do [the rowdy far-Left behave the way they do]?>>

I don’t know. Immaturity? Hypersensitivity? How about you ask them?

<<They mock and criticise people protesting outside abortion clinics, arguing it violates free choice, yet practice the same tactics (and worse).>>

I know, right! The hypocrisy is appalling.

<<They argue "If you don't want abortions, don't have one!", but fail to comprehend "If you don't like alt-right speakers, don't attend their speeches".>>

Sing it, brother!