SR and Paul,

I can see that you are trying desperately hard (and failing miserably) to find some equivalent of the abhorrent behaviour of Sam Dastardly, First taking money directly for personal expenses, and then standing on a platform emblazoned with the insignia of the Aus government and whole heartedly endorsing China annexation of the SCS in direct contravention of the government and Labor policy, then advises the Chinese agent on actions to avoid ASIO surveillance.

Three strikes and you are out Mate.

Dastaryi is a running sore for Labor. Shorten seems to have something smelly in his pilchers too.

Not that Shorten's credibility is worth anything. He is bunging on that that wide-eyed girlie look of innocence, 'Who, me?' look more often. It is his trademark. No need for a lie detector there.

leoj any comment on the fall of Coalition members over section 44. With the HC booting of the non citizen Fiona Nash from parliament. Then their number two pick, Hollie Hughes was found to have stuck her snout in the taxpayer funded trough a bit to early, that seen her flicked. Now the government is refusing to refer its dodgy members to the court. You had lots to say when it was only a couple of Greens, now the boot is well and truly on the other foot. But you have been deafeningly quite on the matter.

Paul1405,

LOL . When you get your own site you can go around hijacking threads and directing posters what to post.

In the interim, here is the thread title and the original post, so go for it!
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=8046&page=1

Dear Shadow Minister,

Are you really equating what Sam did compared to shoving hundreds of millions of dollars from Australia into the pockets of Saddam Hussein? A sadistic dictator whose aggression ultimately cost thousands of allied soldiers their lives.

Get real.

SR,

Your faux outrage is amusing, I am not comparing Sam Dastardly's treasonous behaviour with the German invasion of Poland either precisely because it they are both irrelevant to the topic. I know that you desperately trying to deflect from Sam's horrendous behaviour by dredging up ancient history, but no one's buying it.

What do you think of the weasel's 115 pointed questions of the defence department on the behalf of China. I think that the Peking Schmuck should not darken the Senate ever again.