loudmouth, and your point is?

(continued........)

Loudmouth, I've said my piece. If you wish to challenge anything I wrote please do so giving me some form of explanation refuting what I have written. I am always willing to learn.

Altrav,

So where did you get this idea ht the Rothschilds don't have to submit any financial returns ? Are you saying that every British government since the early nineteenth century has connived at this ? Where's your sources ?

Joe

Joe,

Don't spoil a good conspiracy theory, everyone knows that conspiracy theories make the world go round.

Loudmouth, finally you're getting it. The answer is yes. King George the ? sold out to that bastard so he could fight Napoleon, by borrowing 1 million pounds off him to finance the war. In return Rothschids demanded he be allowed to start the first bank of England. In doing so charging interest, which they are still paying today. At the same time the scum also lent money to Napoleon. I want tell you what he did which led him to acquire all the stocks of England for next to nothing. (another day) Apparently they have banks in all but three countries in the world. They own the 'City of London' and therefore the Queen. These things are not 'in your face', you have to look for them. So, LOOK FOR THEM YOURSELF! Let me know where I am wrong and I will update my so called list of 'conspiracy theories'.

Alt Rav,

England has had banks for hundreds of years, long before the Napoleonic Wars. And they've always charged interest, nothing new about that.

If you assert, you must corroborate. It's not up to anybody else to prove you wrong.

Joe