The Forum > General Discussion > Transparency OK for everyone but GetUp!
Transparency OK for everyone but GetUp!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
Posted by Shadow Minister, Thursday, 2 November 2017 1:56:00 PM
| |
Rumour has it that a conservative version of GetUp! is in formation. When I say 'rumor', I did read it in the popular press, but reporting is not much different from rumour these days.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 2 November 2017 2:06:41 PM
| |
George Soros is a terrorist.
I want to explain why I think this is a true statement, and if anyone thinks I'm wrong or thinks different then I sincerely hope they make their argument and try to prove me wrong. If they don't or can't, then I'll just assume I'm right. http://www.infowars.com/full-page-ny-times-ad-demands-antifa-revolution-to-overthrow-trump/ Here's the article: Scroll down to the image to see the full page ad; Quote - THIS NIGHTMARE MUST END THE TRUMP/PENCE REGIME MUST GO NOV 4 IT BEGINS Be There. Join With The Thousands Who Will Gather In Cities And Town Across The Country A Movement Of Protests That Continue Every Day And Night Growing Until We Become Millions Determined Not To Stop Until This Regime Is Removed From Power Ok in their own words they're gathering 'with the purpose of driving this regime from power'. They aren't saying 'We need to vote this current elected president out at the next election' using 'the battle of ideas to win the hearts and minds of the people'. So, they have no respect for the democratic rule of law: -evidenced in the statement 'Drive this regime from power'. - They don't respect will of the voting public. The word 'Drive' in the absence of 'Voting Trump/Pence out' is reasonable construed as pertaining to using violence / property damage / civil unrest. Terrorism: The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. http://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/terrorism So in my opinion George Soros is a terrorist, and anyone who donates to his causes is funding terrorism. Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 3 November 2017 12:53:27 AM
| |
So far as I can see, the only thing the right is upset about is that an AFP operation became public knowledge.
Why aren't *all* AFP raids covered by the media? Posted by Rusty Catheter, Friday, 3 November 2017 5:08:05 PM
| |
Getup's values are quite different from most of the workers in the AWU. It is commonly suspected, but not proven that this raid was engineered for political purposes. If so, it has highlighted the amount of money that should be used to get better conditions for workers, but is instead is diverted to the land rights for gay whales brigade. The workers won't be happy.
Posted by benk, Friday, 3 November 2017 6:30:07 PM
| |
It is good to see all the bedwetting left whingers out in force to protect the illegal money laundering scheme dreamt up by the corrupt unions, labor and the gangreens.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 4 November 2017 8:05:41 AM
|
The one thing that ICAC ruled illegal was the company that was set up to receive donations from proscribed donors. That GetUp! is essentially doing exactly the same just shows the rank hypocrisy of Labor and the gangreens.
Now that GetUp is registered as an associated organisation, their collection of illegal donations will have to stop, and their donations will need to be declared in the same way that other political donation are.