You would think regressives who have stuffed this country with uncontrolled spending, allowing terrorist here under the guise of refugees, ruining our energy supply and lumping us with the nbn would crawl in a hole and hide. Instead they pick a few little faults with a woman who irritates them while ignoring the country wreckers. Drain the swamp you voted for before picking on Pauline I say.

SteeleRedux "struck speechless"? Wouldn't that be nice if it were true!

Foxy For the amount of time she has been in the public eye so to speak you could only come up with three things.

The amount of bias within the MSM who virtually follow her around in the hope she says something that they will be able to misinterpret or lie about, you can do better or can't you.

As runner says the others have by a long short caused damage than Hanson where is your indignation toward them.

NDIS, NBN, Submarines, F35's Navy landing ships, over 50,000 welfare for lifers, Time does not permit more but I am sure others could add to the list.

One more important fact from so called stupid ideas and mistakes very useful and innovative inventions have come,correct me if anyone thinks that statement is in any way wrong.

Pauline Hanson, fish and chip lady, inarticulate and all the rest of it, has the Left crapping themselves. The more they sneer and whine about her, the tougher she gets. The sanctimonious, totalitarian Left is Hanson's best electoral asset. They probably should be getting an allowance from One Nation for boosting her.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-19/new-subs-fleets-promised-stealth-technology-questioned/9058858

"Questions surround Australia's new submarine fleet's ultra-stealth propulsion technology
By political reporter Tom Iggulden
Updated 19 Oct 2017, 7:21pm


The Navy's new stealth submarines might not be so stealthy after all.

Key points:

"Ultra-quiet pump-jet propulsion technology was a key selling point in the subs' design

It was supposed to help make the subs "the world's most advanced conventionally powered submarine"

Executive director of Naval Group now says propeller technology might be used on the submarines

A top executive at the company building the subs has thrown doubt on whether cutting-edge pump-jet propulsion technology will be used as planned.

The ultra-quiet technology was a key selling point for the French design that won the Government's competitive evaluation process to build the new submarines at a cost of $50 billion..."

Corrected from above.

As runner says the others have by a long shot caused more damage than Hanson where is your indignation toward them.

leoj - I personally do not think the clowns know what they want or for that matter what they are going to get, it appears they keep changing there mind.

It appear there is only ONE dead certain fact, we have wasted $50 Billion dollars.

Oh how easy is it to spend big when it is not coming out of your own pocket.