Well we will wait and see wont we.

Watching Q&A last night a young Chinese man expressed he was Homosexual and his relationship with his male partner is not accepted in Chinese family culture.

Because Australia is a Multicultural Nation if SSM is passed as Law then his family culture will be identified at law as criminal because it does not accept his relationship as normal. This then leads to having to educate that all relationships of love are equal and normal.

Once children learn where babies are conceived and born, the question remains who is the father? Science and biology is downplayed to the emotion of sentimentality to cater for the sensitive child with two mums or two fathers. We are returning to the primitive wild, where children do not know their father, or their mother. Genetic heritage is not seen as important

How has SSM changed Canada 10 years on?

http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/11/6758/

Problems with SSM in other countries

http://speakupaustralia.com/

Just for some balance - here are five worst arguments
for the no campaign:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-06/same-sex-marriage-five-worst-arguments-for-no-campaign/8871020

And here are the experiences of same-sex marriage in Ireland:

http://www.smh.com.au/world/this-wasnt-a-political-campaign-irelands-samesex-marriage-vote-and-ours-20170915-gyi3il.html

cont'd ...

Quoting from one of the links:

"The Anglican Church itself was created so Henry VIII
could get divorced - and let's not forget that Jesus
was raised by a man who was not his biological father,
which might suggest the virtue of sympathy for blended
families. The idea that kids need the active involvement
of a father and a mother to be "normal" is not borne
out by the data, or in the many same-sex and single parent
families we already have, but it remains powerful after
centuries of being the social norm."

"Of-course, this has very little to do with the question
at hand," on the postal survey.