Yuyutsu has finally landed a point about not consenting to the state.
Foxy answers "Of course with speaking you do run the risk of not being listened to - depending on what you're saying and whether it's
credible."
-
If a kid has information about families she can switch off the big mouth gabbling rubbish. Or even choose to learn English that was forced upon the noble , independent and exemplary Britons.

Dear Big Nana,

We've gone down this path previously where
so called "studies" have been cited and
discredited. If you have any reputable
studies that have been done, kindly
provide them for us.

Love is not enough - you say.

I'm sure that this adage would probably apply
to various circumstances and cases - not
just to same-sex couples, single-parents,
et cetera.

Foxy, I'm saying the yes vote is campaigning against the validity of the no vote to even examine consequences.

Sham media and sham politicians are even saying it!

What is democracy if you're not even allowed to discuss possible consequences when every child ever raised ever was taught to examine the possible consequences?

Go Australia: where are we allowed to go again?

what Foxy really means that if facts don't confirm her perverted narrative then they don't count.

No runner that is your usual method of debating
on this forum. Not mine.

Dear meme...

You don't need anyone's position to debate
an issue. And there's nutters on both sides.
So ignore those who you feel
are against your right to speak out.
Or better still, take positive action
and make your feelings felt by voting in the
postal survey. Have your say. We've been
given this opportunity. We should take it.