Perhaps the following link may help clarify things:

http://thoughtcatalog.com/daniel-hayes/2015/11/does-islam-really-say-its-okay-to-kill-people-or-is-that-just-one-interpretation/

This is just some thoughts on the subject.

Foxy,

From your link,

"The quran is OK with killing people who deserve death, but it explicitly states that killing the “innocent” is completely forbidden. This is where people get misinformed, and how deception gets spread: The “innocent” is not what you think it is. The innocent by the definition given in the Quran are strict Muslims. It explicitly goes into detail about what makes you not innocent. If you believe in other religions or are atheist, you are not innocent. If you are unclean, eat banned foods, you are not innocent. If you do not abide by the sexual rules laid out in the Quran, you are not innocent. If you do not do your duty of prayer, fasting, and mosque attending, you are no innocent. So on and so forth. If you are not innocent, you are not protected by the book. In some regards you have a chance to become “innocent” and convert but if you do not you should not live– according the Quran. Many of the innocence breaking acts are immediately punishable by death.. "

You agree with that?

How are you going with the homosexual paedophilia in Afghanistan?
The Taliban virtually wiped it out but we helped to reintroduce the practice of "boys for pleasure and women for breeding".

A man makes a football....is he responsible for the way society uses it?
Both responsibility and irresponsibility rests with the society of the day

Dear Is Mise,

We've covered this topic earlier.

Besides, there's more in the link that I gave
which you did not cite:

"If you delve into the ancient books of any
Abrahamic faith tradition or even just
study their documented history of the last
milennia - you're going to find a lot of blood."

"That is not specifically relevant to those
living in modern times. The vast majority of Muslims,
Jews, or Christians, are not violent people and
have no interest in revisiting the barbarity of
ancient times."

"There's a great deal of focus lately on specific
passages in the Qur'an, but what's actually
relevant is what any given person makes of these
passages. You can find literalists and extremists
in any faith tradition, and will if you look hard
enough."

Foxy,

Define 'kill'.

Perhaps our current alleged jihadists in Sydney could help you;
maybe they only intended to kill the airline passengers a little bit.

Dear Is Mise,

The Australian Federal Police and ASIO
told reporters - the information that they
currently have will be passed onto the
courts because at present it's merely
speculation of "alleged terror plot"
"alleged Jihadists", "alleged bomb threat,"
and so on. They feel that it's best to wait
and see what the courts make of all this.

Why are you referring me to these "alleged
Jihadists?" I have made it quite clear many
times on this forum that I do not support
violence or criminals so why do you insinuate
otherwise? I have also stated that you can find
extremists and fanatics in every walk of life.
This does not mean that I support them. On
the contrary. I have stated that those who
break our laws should bear the full brunt.

You seem determined to want me to "define kill,"
for you. I think that you're quite capable of
finding your own definition without my help.
After all you are pro guns and should be more
than familiar with the term.

However, as far as our conversation is concerned
(in this context) -
I would define "kill" as putting an end to, or
causing the failure or defeat of our communication.
This happens often when some people are more
interested in condemnation and punishment than in
explanation. Explanations seem tantamount to
sympathizing and excusing. When someone is reluctant
to modify their judgements the result is usually a
complete breakdown in communication