The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The 'Elite'

The 'Elite'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
Adrian I'd like to agree with you. I too found these comments hard to swallow. This is why I asked the question. I have no personal reason or connection to this question, only that the source/s as I remember were excerpts from old historic publications like archival records. Even written in what I would have considered 'period speak'. Oh well, I guess conspiracy theories or not I'll never really know the truth, as far fetched as these claims are to me, I never say never, because you never know what you might discover around the corner.
Posted by ALTRAV, Saturday, 15 July 2017 9:54:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Clearly few posters give a damn about the Rothschild's, who have no sway in Australia.
Posted by ttbn, Saturday, 15 July 2017 10:48:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ttbn - Looking at some of the companies owned or controlled by them I would say you are wrong.

Banks controlled or owned approx 164 worldwide.
Search "ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS" I don't believe all the info there.

They are also under investigation.
Search "Rothschild Bank Now Under Criminal Investigation Over Missing $4 Billion In Global Corruption Probe"

Wealth
Investopedia estimates the family’s total wealth at over $2 trillion in assets and holdings, including some of the world’s oldest living corporations:

…their holdings span a number of diverse industries, including financial services, real estate, mining, energy and even charitable work.There are a few Rothschild-owned financial institutions still operating in Europe, including N M Rothschild & Sons Ltd in the United Kingdom, and Edmond de Rothschild Group in Switzerland. The family also owns more than a dozen wineries in North America, Europe, South America, South Africa and Australia.

Now that was saved articles I have but would need further checking to check as there is a lot of untruths on inet.
Posted by Philip S, Saturday, 15 July 2017 11:52:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Philip.S, thank you. You are the first and seemingly only one to 'answer my question'. Some of what you say 'rings a bell'. I also agree that I choose not to believe some of what is put out there, even if it is from a 'reputable' medium. I would however lean towards the 'where there's smoke there's fire' sentiment, otherwise I wonder why would there be such scrutiny of such a dynasty/empire. I am reminded that some years ago, (don't remember the details), that Bill Gates HAD to halve his empire? I don't remember the reason but I seem to recall he could be a threat (buggered if I know to who). It was as if, because of his wealth, he could somehow try to de-stabilise the Govt? I still, to this day don't know what that was all about. Even if I researched it I would take the info with a pinch of salt. Well at least I am getting wiser with Postings like yours. Good on you, keep it up.
Posted by ALTRAV, Saturday, 15 July 2017 2:18:26 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I have no knowledge of the ROTHCHILDS, their family, or business interests. Other than it seems almost obscene to me, that one family controls a personal fortune of over a 'trillion Dollars' someone quoted herein? After all the Principal within that family, who has carriage for controlling much of the assets, stocks & bonds and hard currency of all types, is just an ordinary human being.

Somebody who has all the foibles that comes from being human, and who needs to; eat, drink, sleep, bathe and defecate just like the poorest soul living in the slums of Calcutta, one so disenfranchised from Indian society, he wears the mantle, and belongs to the cast, that of 'untouchable'.

Don't get me wrong, I'm no Marxist, nor am I a goody two shoes, but possessing and controlling a trillion dollars? It's positively obscene. And if it's true, these ROTHCHILDS have never been audited - what in hell's name are the IRS doing? Sorry, I realise I'm somewhat obtuse - they own the IRS as well, eh?
Posted by o sung wu, Saturday, 15 July 2017 2:42:28 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I feel I should say something about the detractors of my post. I would like to put it out there that I am 'old school', and as such I do not wear or tolerate fools. At all! Any time I say something I am repeating something that I either read or was told in conversation. So the only time I will make a 'statement' is if I have been privy to it's origin and can attest to its validity, accuracy and authenticity. I absolutely abhor and detest political correctness. I have 'broken down' the words 'politically correct' and to my horror I found, (to over simplify), it ultimately can be extended to mean, a 'LIE'! A recent example was one of Trumps pre-election promises was he would re-instate 'Glass-Stiegal'. (look it up). Now he's in, I saw an interview recently where one of his MP's was asked about Trump back-flipping on this promise. He dis-agreed and said 'no we are going to implement a 21'st century Glass-Stiegal. The interviewer kept repeating the question, to no avail, ultimately she closed by inferring that it was not going to happen. PC goes straight over peoples heads because they only hear what they want to hear. There is only one interpretation of correct and anything else is anything but 'correct', and so it goes that anything that is 'politically' correct, by definition, must be incorrect or even to the final point of it being i LIE!
Posted by ALTRAV, Saturday, 15 July 2017 2:52:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy