The Forum > General Discussion > How come a Royal Commission in the NT is unaware?
How come a Royal Commission in the NT is unaware?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
But circumcision of boys without anaesthetic in the bush still happens as a part of initiation, although some mothers do request their sons get done in hospital under sterile conditions before the ceremony happens. I'm in two minds about this practise because although it's painful it's not mutilation in the sense that we know it and the end result is no different to millions of men around the world who were circumcised as babies and in the traditional communities initiation is a huge part of a boy's life. He cannot become an elder if he hasn't been initiated.
The only problem I have with it is the risk of infection which has increased due to the use of nonbiodegradable goods in the law ground, things like open tins of food left lying around, which attracts flies. If a boy does get infected he is not allowed to leave the lawground for treatment and if a male doctor can't be induced to travel to that law ground then the infected boy risks permanently distortion and damage to the penis and urethra.
I think if they wish to retain this practise there needs to be health education done by male nurses or doctors to address the infection issue.