Ahh yes Foxy, you neatly tied One Nation to "other" radical right wing parties.

They've released a mug shot of one of the attackers. It's not the best mug shot ever but if one knew him they might recognize him.

The filthy coward.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-14/police-release-image-of-man-after-andrew-bolt-attacked/8617846

Gord. Can we get over this? Right or Left, let the legal system do its work: the thugs are identified, Fight or Left, arrested, charged, tried and probably put on a good behaviour bond, or whatever.

The one bright bit would be that the bloke who got it in the nuts is probably still sore. He'll probably limp into court. I wonder which nut copped it worst, the right or the left one ? God moves in mysterious ways, perhaps he's biased :)

Joe

Dear Joe (Loudmouth),

Did you know that the term testicle derives from
the Latin word "testis" meaning "witness."

In Roman times men placed their right hand on their
balls before giving testimony in court.
The reason being having testicles supposedly made them
whole. As opposed to women and eunuchs who were not
allowed to testify.

Foxy,

You are clearly not up to speed, Antifa the extremist left whinge group has essentially claimed responsibility. See my earlier reply. That the cops have a facial photo of one of the thugs means that it is not long before they have him in cuffs.

The far right has reclaim, the far left has GetUp. Both sides members instigate violence, except the far left does it far more frequently.

SR,

I meet your Brevik nutjob and raise you the Red brigade.

I also feel sorry for you that you cannot grasp simple concepts.

Thugs firing a sandwich or foam into someone's face is assault of the same magnitude, however, general flinging of sandwiches or foam that does not hit the victim is not assault by definition. Also, if someone aims a sandwich at a bin, but hits someone by mistake that is negligence not assault (No actual intent). Finally adults are considered fully responsible for their actions, where children especially younger children are not.

So on all the aggravating factors of assault i.e. actual contact with foam and fists, the premeditated intent, and the wearing of masks to shirk responsibility, the violent attack on Bolt was aggravated assault. However, a sandwich lobbed by a child, for an undetermined reason, that hits no one, and the reasoning behind the throw is never determined meets none of the criteria to be called assault.

So essentially your comparison is piss poor, and so I taunt you a second time.

Dear Shadow Minister,

The following link explains some of the problems
we are facing in this country. We should
all be very concerned:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/investigations/asio-monitoring-of-rightwing-extremists-uncovered-alleged-plan-to-attack-radical-left-20160813-ggrsgt.html

Right or Left - both should be a worry.