The Forum > General Discussion > What Should Be In OUR Treaty ?
What Should Be In OUR Treaty ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Page 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Above, Doog touted more land for Indigenous groups. My dear wife came from a community which has twelve thousand acres of beautiful land, bits (like most farms) that aren't that useful or workable, but some areas with topsoil a metre deep (it's right on Lake Alexandrina, after all). What are the people there doing with it ? Vegetable gardens ? NO. Dairy farms ? NO. Chook farms, pigs, orchards, fish farms ? NO. What then ?
200 head of cattle. One person could run that. As well as his own private herd, down in the back paddocks. Not that I'm asserting that's being done.
We lived in another community up the Murray which controlled about eight thousand acres. Unlimited water licence. No rates (it's Aboriginal land, which can't be sold, therefore can't berated). Owned, not being paid off, like most farms. A government-funded employment scheme. So what are they doing with it ? Any of it ? Even one acre ?
Nothing.
So tell me about giving people more land back. Would I ever march again for 'Land Rights' ? Maybe not. Put it in a Referendum ? Not bloody likely.
It may not seem like it, but I'm dedicated totally to the Indigenous Cause. We made Flags for that purpose back in the seventies, and I'm proud of it. But I'll never defend lies, fabrications, mis-truths, rumours, or empty claims, not for a minute. Give me something genuine and solid, and I'll be there. And there are a hell of a lot of people like me, people who want desperately to contribute, but are sick of the corruption, lies and bullsh!t.
Joe