The Forum > General Discussion > Sharia Law is coming (or is that forbidden?)
Sharia Law is coming (or is that forbidden?)
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
<<I am happy for all to have their own thinking ... As long as no-one is being hurt or harm being done.>>
The problem is that there is always harm being done to some extent. It’s not just Jihadists, Islamists, or the ACL. Even the most casual Church-goer lends their passive support to the above.
I could list a lot of damaging effects that religion has in Australia, but we wouldn’t even be able to agree that much of it was damaging to begin with, so there’s little point in going there unless we both feel like being locked into a lengthy debate that would never end. And besides, I’ve had that debate ad nauseam.
Yes, yes, the charity organisations. I know. I’ve been there many times, too. I will say, though, that the banner which religion provides charitable people to organise under is a bonus aspect of it. But it’s arguably a small bonus, given the lost revenue in tax and the social harm that religions cause.
<<I also know you to have rejected Catholicism and you have your reasons for that. Fair enough.>>
It was actually a Protestant denomination: Lutheran. I don’t think there’s any such thing as a former-Catholic that doesn’t still consider themselves to be a Catholic. But, anyway…
<<What is most often lost in the easy, ritualist, mud-slinging against 'theists' and 'religion' is that everyone believes.>>
I don’t think anyone denies that we all ‘believe’. Not all beliefs are equal, however.
<<The difference where runner and others are concerned is that their understanding and the way they seek personal transcendence are 'billboarded', made largely obvious by their declared preference for a set of beliefs.>>
Yes (although I don’t know what YOU mean by “personal transcendence”), but you’re glossing over the fact that some belief systems and worldviews are more rational and justifiable than others. They’re not all equal. Some clearly align with reality better than others, and some approach reality in a more rational way than others.
I, personally, have always advocated for a scientific-sceptic approach to everything.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Skepticism#Scientific_and_methodological_skepticism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Scientific_skepticism