And that is where you are completely wrong Paul.

We need a return to the complete right to "use lethal force, such as guns, to simply protect property. If someone is making off with your chickens, you do not have the right to shoot them". This is one of the problems with todays society, generated by ratbags like Greens.

We too often let minor criminal acts go unpunished, & there are too many slaps on the wrist. This has trained a generation of thugs to believe they can get away with anything, thus escalating their thuggery.

We are going to have to shoot a few, or at least severely "correct" these people to get back the safety of our streets, & our homes. We are getting far too many no go Muslim areas in Sydney, & Islander areas in Brisbane that I know of, because of this softly softly approach that has trained these thugs to ignore the law, & & have no desire for peaceful coexistence.

I will give you if you like, a recent experience of this, proving it is not safe for a solo man, let alone a solo woman, to walk home from a group of Sydney railway stations today.

Weak magistrates have generated this problem, following Green ideology, & it is going to get worse, if we don't start coming down really hard on these thugs.

Paul,

"Issy, something that escapes you is the overriding principle that you do not have the right to use lethal force, such as guns, to simply protect property."

When did I ever say that one did, or is this another example of Green's mudslinging?

" If someone is making off with your chickens, you do not have the right to shoot them dead. Although I believe you think you have such a right."

Keep slinging!!

"The classic case here in NSW is of farmer and gunnie folk hero Ian Turnbull,"

Care to reference that wild allegation?
Who, other than some dimwit Green thinks that he is considered a folk hero?

The man in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, defended himself against armed criminals and was well within his rights to fear for his life, just as he would be were he in NSW.

Anyone who breaks into a house intends to kill the occupant(s), simple as that.

That is just Paul1405 doing the dirty work of NSW Greens Sh**bridge, the boy who swings from the coat-tails of the notorious 'Aunty'(Paul1405's familiar nick for her) Lee Rhiannon, who has NO policies and NO practical contribution to make to society and get a free ride as a Greens senator for her storms in tea cups.

NSW Greens Sh**bridge, like Rhiannon, picks up anything and everything that might have some prospect for political stirring. Like Rhiannon, 'Boy' Sh**bridge has NO ideas and nothing practical to benefit the public and occupies himself with being a public nuisance and getting headlines.

'Gun Control' is the creature of billionaire George Soros, the international currency dealer who interferes in democracies by sponsoring far leftist disruption and demonstrations. That is weird and inexplicable to many, but perhaps some finance expert might venture possibles as to why he might do that.

Anyhow, 'gun control' is aimed exclusively at confiscating lawfully acquired and used firearms and by reputable, licensed citizens. 'Gun control' is a furphy and a blind. It is 'doublespeak', confusing and reversing the meaning of words. Marxists are notorious for that. 'Gun control' has nothing to do with reducing crimes or even dealing with the drug gangs and dealers that are responsible for almost all weapons crimes, including with firearms.

In Australia the Greens have resolutely opposed and rolled logs in the way of police trying to contain drugs and the gangs who make millions from drug manufacture and trafficking. In Queensland, Greens and Labor are fixed upon dismantling the successful VLAD* laws. Figure that one out if you like, while remembering that they both serve their political interests.

*VLAD laws,Vicious Lawless Association Disestablishment Act 2013 is an act of the Parliament of Queensland, enacted to "severely punish members of criminal organisations that commit serious offenses". [Wikipedia]

PAUL! PAUL!

Where are you?

It does seem that less ethnically diverse nations are less prone
to modern day terrorist attacks.

Nations, like Japan, and mainland China.

There is protection in being mostly surrounded by your own ethnic group.

These societies also do not have their ethnicity divided up by fundamentalist
religions, who eventually through intermarriage within the religious sect, split a
harmonious United ethnic group into two tribes.

One example of this is Tibet, where the Chinese monks have Caused division.

The evidence of ethnic divisions can be seen in all the conflicts we see on the news
every night. The time when it really erupts into violence s in the times of
economic hard times. It was the Great Depression that was the catalyst, that set Germany on a path, that led to the persecution of the Jews and the election of Hitler and
World War 2. In that order.

It's not taught that way in our schools is it? Hitler is always blamed totally.

How much proof do people need, how many times do they have to see this happen,
before they will acknowledge or accept, that multiculturalism will always contain this threat if it is not understood or if there is a denial of this reality

Of course the territorial wars in the Middle East and the fundamentalist religious
Tribalism of certain ethnic groups, are already triggering the terrortorial attacks(so called terrorist attacks,) in our multiethnic society.

Is mise

You say that a human egg contains all the genetic material from the mother
and father to become a human being. The seed of a big oak tree, also contains all the biological genetic information it needs to become a huge tree, but at the Seed stage it is certainly not a fully grown oak tree.

A chicken egg on your plate may be fertilised too, and contain all the genetic coding
to become a fully functioning chicken, but at the fertilised egg stage sitting on your plate it is not a chicken.

Many cellular divisions need to take place before it developes into a chicken.
A fertilised human egg, must also divide and multiple over several months to become
anything remotely like a human being.

In times of Famine, extreme stress or illness of the mother, nature will also spontaneously abort the foetus because if it survives, it may not be healthy.
Nature which is law on this planet, holds no sentiment for human life and
before mankind’s invention of antibiotics and penicillin a huge percentage of humans
never made it past their 2nd birthday, let alone 20years. Just walk around any cemetery dating back to the early 19hundreds.

Mankind thinks his life is special but step out into the wilderness with no protection. Nature will snuff out the life of any human without protection, very quickly.
It’s only with the man made protections from nature around us that we survive.