The Forum > General Discussion > The dark side of the Hazelwood shutdown.
The dark side of the Hazelwood shutdown.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
When it comes to rising electricity costs -
Which party classified electricity as "non-essential" and imposed a GST on it?
Which party told electricity suppliers they should not only charge consumers for the cost of upgrading their networks instead of internally funding it plus add an additional 10% on top? (This is how they planned to build up the network for future sale - make the consumer pay).
Which party has been promoting the ongoing privatisation of all electricity generation and opened up the market to phony resellers who take an extra premium on top of their costs? Gas companies selling electricity - electricity companies selling gas, paper-shuffling money-takers treating energy supply like mobile phone contracts.
Which party actively promoted the installation of roof-top solar cells only to later renege on the price paid by suppliers?
Which party has always treated important public utilities as something to be exploited for financial gain?
Which party not only strongly resisted the initial construction of the Snowy Scheme but actually boycotted it's opening - only to later claim it as a national icon?