Once, a judge did in 1985 about a statement I made at the Bar table (of head a statement referring to page and details) and triumphally stating I was wrong as he had the law report and the case I was (then) referring to was not at all in that Law Report and neither then on that page. I then produced my copy of the Law Report and handed it over to the Clerk.

The judge checked it out and then responded that I had a “later” edition and it did have in it what I had stated and asked me where I got it from. I responded “Your Honour I purchased it for 20 cents in the opshop.” Well, he got the message it was none of his business.

He asked me how I knew it all of head, and I responded; “Your Honour as a child my mother told me that if you put a book under your pillow then the next day you know it all.” The judge responded “I asked for that.” Never again did a judge challenge me as they had all been briefed how I had put this judge in place.

However, many lawyers (barristers included) do make nonsense of statements and generally get away with it. As I proved with Mr. Peter Hanks QC, when he had purportly quoted a judge quoting nine words, but in it had substituted two critical words to change the entire meaning. When I was subsequently before the High Court of Australia point out he had FRAUDULENTLY obtained orders, setting out also other inappropriate conduct by him, the response by Mr. Peter Hanks QC was to the Court that it was not relevant! As such he didn’t deny the issue, and he could not because I proved to the Court what he had stated and what the judge actually had stated. What cases ere about and how he had fabricated different versions of it, etc.
The lies and deception that goes on in the Courts is horrific. I pursue the RULE OF LAW against them!

See also
http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_Q