try to play together nicely, children.

when kaiser howard dispatched soldiers to iraq, i hoped the result would be a bomb plot to remove federal parliament from the landscape. this would have taught the dummies that invading other countries was a serious business, not to be done unless electoral defeat was imminent.

alas, johnny was too slick for me, our presence didn't disturb the alqaeda radar. so no bombs bd, and no threat in oz unless we believe the police. they may be reporting real threats, i'm not sure they're smart enough to make it up.

but, bd, they're here in response to oz's attack on their land, or religion. they're not evil, just really angry and for good cause.

Read or seen the news lately?
Some idiots have just recently tried ramming their 4x4 into the terminal building at Glasgow Airport, bursting into flames, days after the threat in London.
Terrorists are alive and well all over the world and more active today than ever before, they apparently act in "cells" and looks like these cells act on command from another idiot, when the time is right, this is typical of a coward and the devices they use are typical of a cowardly regime, I mean..thousands of six inch nails together with home-made explosives placed in crowded areas, meant to be detonated, people not getting a chance to run. This is terrorism in its raw form, cowards walking amongst us, amongst our children. You make me sick.

SPANKY: "Some idiots have just recently tried ramming their 4x4 into the terminal building at Glasgow Airport, bursting into flames, days after the threat in London."

In the light of this development in Scotland, I think that all Australian Muslims should interned. Those who refuse to sign an oath of allegiance to John Howard's government should be rendered forthwith to Guantanamo Bay.

Then we'd all be safe.

>SPANKY, "Terrorists are alive and well all over the world and more active today than ever before, they apparently act in "cells" and looks like these cells act on command from another idiot"

The Iraq War has been a boon to all terrorist recruiters, on top of being a pack of lies and incredibly costly to taxpayers. Your paranoia exceeds reason though. Read this: http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/09/71743
"But despite the never-ending litany of warnings and endless stories of half-baked plots foiled, how likely are you, statistically speaking, to die from a terrorist attack?"

>"this is typical of a coward and the devices they use are typical of a cowardly regime"

What regime are you referring to?? ? And please lose the coward slur. It takes a lot of guts and conviction to explode a deadly device in a crowd of people, considering what they are up against.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_warfare#Asymmetric_warfare_and_terrorism

>"I mean..thousands of six inch nails together with home-made explosives placed in crowded areas, meant to be detonated, people not getting a chance to run."

So a terrorist should give people a chance to run and escape? That defeats the entire purpose of being a terrorist and setting off a bomb. I doubt the innocent Iraqis killed by Western forces in Iraq had a chance to escape either. In fact, many of them were targeted and murdered in cold indifference (if you don't know examples you only watch the biased mainstream media for news).

>"Read or seen the news lately? Some idiots have just recently tried ramming their 4x4 into the terminal building at Glasgow Airport"

Try to ignore the gaudy graphics...
"White Terrorists Don't Make CNN, Fox, or MSNBC"
http://www.icomment.org/index.php/main/video/show?id=5558703

As a “CONSTITUTIONALIST” I have considerably address the issue in my blog http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QH as well as on my website http://www.schorel-hlavka.com and can only repeat that unless we act within the constitutional framework (which is not being done) we are only going to make matters worse.

In my view John Howard is a TERRORIST as I have extenively set out on my blog.

Wikepedia;
QUOTE
Unit 101 undertook a series of military raids against Palestinians and neighboring Arab states that helped bolster Israeli morale and fortify its deterrent image. The unit was known for targeting civilians as well as Arab soldiers, notably in the widely condemned Qibya operation in the fall of 1953, in which 69 Palestinian civilians, some of them children, were killed by Sharon's troops in a reprisal attack on their West Bank village. In the documentary Israel and the Arabs: 50 Year War, Ariel Sharon recalls what happened after the raid, which was heavily condemned by many Western nations, including the U.S.:
END QUOTE

Clearly Sharon was morally bankrupt to kill civilians, including children, as a reprisal attack. And, he also as Prime minister caused to have two Hams political leaders to be killed by a helicopter shooting rockets in to their office. An Israelis intelligent officer made clear (SBS program-Tuesday 3-7-2007) that one of the Hamas political figures that were killed had just published a book OPPOSING any violence and promoting to pursue a POLITICAL resolution.
And he was ASSASINATED by the Israelis for this!

Now it is all very well to concentrate on Hamas or other groups and ignore what Sharon and others did using Israelis forces!

Now, to do that to “BOLSTER Israeli image and fortify deterrent image” hardly appears to be showing a peace loving Israel.

Sure, Hamas and others may not particularly be Angels (other then Angels of Death) but the Israelis using “ASSASINATION” and “EXTERMINATION” instead of the “RULE OF LAW” should be condemned by any peace loving person.

Support Howard and you might just be regarded as supporting a terrorist (see my blog).

Dear Gerrit
unfortunately, the word 'terrorist' is a political one, chosen by 'us' to make out that 'they' are the bad guys and we the good.

As I've said a few times.. and now again..the issue is really about 'our friends'...and "our enemies".

Those seeking domination of us, or our destruction, or the destruction of our allies/friends, are our "enemies".

If we... seek to exploit, pillage, steal, kill for reasons of self gratification and raw power, then we ourselves are despicable.

If we engage our enemies in other places, to prevent them attaining a level of power which might give them success over us, then we are simply acting responsibly.

In the case of Muslims, I point you to the murder of Ka'b Bin Al Ashraf by Mohammad's hit squad late at night.

The "Justification" for this is:

a) He mocked mohammad with mean nasty poems.
b) He was stirring up the enemies of the Muslims to attack them.

So, they murdered him.

Important also in that particular incident is "They acted like friends" to coax him out of his home.

Ok.. if that is an example of how Mohammad the founder of Islam worked, then why would we expect less from his followers today, in the same geopolitical context ?

Should we wait until Iran gains nukes before we deal them a decisive blow ?

Are we stupid enough to think they will not try to use every means possible to extend Iranaian/Shia/Islamic power to all the world ? (Ahmadinajad has SAID as much for crying out loud)

You wax eloquent about our constitution, ok.. but one day, unless the rest of us take action, you will wake up one day mouthing the word 'Oh..the Constitution' and some bearded characters at your door will reply "What" constitution... you are now under the rule of the Sharee'a