phanto,

There is no need for you to tell Foxy that there is no need to tell you what there is no need to do, either. That’s also patronising.

Banjo
Forbidding to opt out of society?

Courts Legislation Amendment
(Disrespectful Behaviour) Bill 2016
New South Wales

Schedule 1 Amendment of Supreme Court Act 1970
Schedule 2 Amendment of Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Schedule 3 Amendment of District Court Act 1973
Schedule 4 Amendment of Local Court Act 2007
Schedule 5 Amendment of Coroners Act 2009

Good grief , the coroner as well. Refuse to be arrested by police for refusing to stand, refuse to stand when resist arrest is heard, refuse to be arrested for refuse to be arrested.

Dear Nick,

Gun ownership is the least of my concerns. In his post to Foxy (Monday, 13 February 2017 10:23:38 AM), Is Mise referred inaccurately to my views on that matter, so I responded in order to correct that wrong impression - otherwise I had no reason to ever mention that subject.

I would be more than happy, in fact even prefer, to live in a society where gun ownership is limited - provided only that all the people of that society accepted its constitution which allowed the said society to limit them so.

---

Dear Banjo,

«Would you be so kind as to let me have the references to the law that forbids "opting-out from society", together with the relevant sanctions ?»

I see that Nick was faster than myself to respond - well done Nick.

I would rather start from the beginning of the cycle of life: It is offence to be born without being registered with the so-called representatives of society or without having a name which society can call you by - http://www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch21s12s03.php

A $1250 fine may not seem a lot, but if you are not part of society, then you wouldn't have even $1 of society's money to pay that fine with.

Well, well there was a referendum , didn't know that:
eferenda: 1898 & 1899

"As the ANA had proposed in Corowa, the people of the colonies then had to vote in a referendum on the Constitution. The 1898 referendum was held in Victoria, New South Wales, South Australia and Tasmania. The result was a majority in all four colonies. The New South Wales parliament, however, had previously stipulated that it would not accept a majority in its colony unless there were in excess of 80 000 votes in favour of Federation. Despite an overwhelming majority in every other colony, New South Wales only reached 71 595 'yes' votes and the Constitution Bill was not passed.

A second round of referenda was held in 1899 and the 'yes' majority was secured in all of the participating colonies: New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania.. With over 107 000 'yes' votes for Federation in New South Wales, Queensland gave the vote to their own people who passed the Bill."

Yuyutsu could vote in OLO or tell Mr Turnbull who may allow a multi-cultural option . The Principality of Hutt River WA is a free state which may have an alliance with Republic of Yuyutsu.

Yuyutsu and nicknamenick,

Would you please refrain from referring to Banjo Paterson as Banjo.

Philips,

As I have already explained to you the only logical response to my behaviour on this forum that seems to bother you is to put up or shut up. Do something or stop whingeing about it. You are neither doing anything that is likely to be successful nor letting it go.

Your refusal to make a choice just shows what a supreme coward you really are.