I speculate, beneficiaries of crime ridden societies, are leaders promising to protect citizenry from crime's ridden bad effects. The suggestion that the CIA was responsible for getting Vietnam veterans addicted to illegal drugs, that US pharmaceutical companies had been well aware of long term chemical addictive effects on US citizenry being overly prescribed pharmaceutical company opiates, leading to citizenry drug addiction for both legal and illegal drugs. That similar solutions with Vietnam soldiers, which Vietnam War wasn't officially considered a war, instead called a police action and that third millennium Middle East military personnel on patrol, is more police action, than resolving a war. Similar police action, US police action tactics patrolling US inner city streets looking for drug users and criminal activities, solution for solving too higher US unemployment and racial employment white skin favouritism, police driving unwanted labour citizenry into inner cities as Donald Trump mentioned in his inaugural speech, is (intentionally) happening to US citizens by Barack Obama democratic party president, which Donald Trump states is going to stop now. Which I say is politically intentional, that drug use and police guard duty to an extent is happening in Australia.

All the warnings on how consuming feel good drugs leads to drug addictions, that anxiety to consume feel good drugs will increase. Myself being news and story entertainment watcher, I rarely find any anti drug addiction stories. What media stories provide are police chasing gang criminal drug dealers and smuggler hand overs. Stories imitate what independent from government influence as though viewers were having vague beliefs guided away from government political support, which no doubt educated busy people want to believe. So believed by many people that establishment has no involvement in illegal drug supplies, movies have story lines on government/CIA involvement. Educated people miss and/or quickly judge, “Hollywood movies don't depict true/realistic ideas”.

Aged 5 years children while under adult speed speaking adult teachers, guiding young children's activities. Adults can't be aware and/or told not to be concerned, how mental stress in children gradually builds, guiding children to solve anxiety, mental stress hurrying issues, childhood building memory neuron connections primary instincts to feel they need to feel good now... solving hurrying simple tasks hour after hour for many more years, constantly reinforcing subconscious needs to feel good, finally ending schooling aged 18 years, an age when consuming as much alcohol as desired, becomes legal.

….....................

Capitalist company/corporation management legal obligation to maximise company account balance sheet profits, management rewarded with monetary bonuses. Technology in extracting coal/shale gas using cracking methods, has lowered energy costs and increased supplies of chemical fertilisers.

Chemical fertiliser companies and wholesale market food suppliers, exampling Monsanto, encouraging farmers to produce as much food as possible. Lobbyists working for global wholesale food corporations, exampling Monsanto, Lobby industrial rich country government politicians and/or the establishment to pay for food, Monsanto supplies, as food aid to third world countries: Africa; India; Indonesia; Philippines; food for oil Middle East; etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto

Cheap, adequate food supplies in third world countries reduces need for third world populations to grow their on food, needing/creating fewer children to increase numbers of hands to help increase family food supplies.

The more third world refugees escaping conflict caused by over population, escaping to Europe, eventually Europe open borders policy has Australia asked to except more refugees.

Capitalism works best on population growth. The only saleable plentiful item of real importance to poverty stricken people is food.

Government leaders are using citizenry tax payer funds to satisfy large global corporations desires to make share holder profits, and executive commissions, using cheap food argument slows third world population growth.

Hey, Steve. Why don't you write an article or essay on whatever takes your fancy and send it send it to Graham for possible publication. Anything longer than a couple of 300 hundred posts puts readers off, I believe. Let's read it all in one go. 800 plus words is the go, I think.

I assume ancient Roman and Chinese soldiers didn't like guard duty on walls to the point of suffering a miserable life, to be rewarded with mere terrible food.
Several SBS documentaries have been shown describing Hadrian's Wall Roman Empire soldiers stationed distances along the wall. Great Wall of China documentary has the wall described as many numbers of peasants working, dying while building the wall. Soldiers ready to fight Mongolians attacking the wall. Documentary states Chinese leaders refused to trade with Mongolians who wanted rice which China had more rice than was needed. Chinese leaders refusing to trade, Mongolians raided Chinese villages, stealing food. Chinese leaders built the wall, stationing soldiers on the wall. The documentary story can easily be assumed that Chinese leaders wanted Mongolians to harass Chinese peasants allowing excuses to build the wall, manning the wall with soldiers.

I see these documentaries as indicating what present day military and inner city guard duty policing is about, that being that spare labour was placed in some defending the nation from enemies. The war on terror out side US and war on drugs inside US. Both I suggest are intentionally created for legalised harassing and justifying militarism. Terrorists harass Middle Eastern peasants for some difficult to explain “god is great” reason, men keen to serve god fail to have more babies than if they were mere food producing peasants.

Modern day refugees willing to risk their lives by venturing across The Mediterranean in over crowded life-rafts to enter an uncertain future. The problems of poverty reflect on the reasons Jesus religion had Jesus born in a manger, a feeding device in a stable.

steve101

this is far more Steve 101 speech than Donald Trump. I doubt whether Donald could talk that long.

and what to say about the novelties introduced by TRUMP?