The Forum > General Discussion > The Future Of Unemployment.
The Future Of Unemployment.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:02:07 AM
| |
Malcolm Turnbull suggests Australia should entertain tax cuts in order to compete for foreign investment in competitive global markets. That a number of people may have to suffer. Australia has many recently retiring workers who are depending on tax payer government retirement pensions. Malcolm Turnbull seems to like scaring citizens into staying at work longer and delaying spending superannuation savings, motivated by fear.
One moment, finance media are concerned about consumer spending, next moment finance media are about house hold savings ratios, too much household debt. Malcolm goes off the G7 and G20 conferences to negotiate agreements on climate change and trade tariffs. If conferences member countries negotiated not to cut taxes to compete against each other, not to use tax cuts to aid foreign investment, I am sure every country would easily agree. Australia is not really that much of an industrial manufacture/technology exporter competitor. Australian could not and would not want to compete against cheaper by the hour Indian and Chinese labour. Agricultural food may be a labour income to be tax lowered big exporter, Malcolm wants to tax foreign backpackers a flat 32% tax. The backpacker tax in itself is a tariff on visiting foreign labour... the poor humour laughs get funnier. If Malcolm lowers taxes than non-existent French leaky submarine contracts which steel was said “won't be poured for 10 more years” will fill up with water and sink. I suggest significant tax cuts were never going to happen, that Malcolm is creating news for media to get in front of citizenry faces to roll over one more goes nowhere annoying (morning radio shock jock) media discussion. Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:07:15 AM
| |
Presently I assume much of the money borrowed from banks goes to lenders bidding on old established building properties at weekend property auctions. Why increase foreign investment on already scary high borrowed GDP ratio figures. I could assume a mythical finance announcement “the more Australia borrows the worse foreign investors see a Australia as a risky investment” choice regardless of tax cut concessions.
I conclude foreign investment “wants” are lies, globalisation propaganda. Democracy politics and market forces are religion replacements, as realistic happenings as Spider-man movies. Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:09:47 AM
| |
If poorly educate and/or violent/angry youth can't find worthy employment and periodic employment benefits are withheld... small organised violent crime will obviously increase. As crime increases more drug dealers needing to support themselves work their way into society life, clubs and pubs, Australia could resemble U.S. crime. with U.S. crime more people end up in jail.
With more crime comes needs for state government financed police, requiring more taxes. Australia militarises towns and city streets as often seen in U.S. crime movies. Malcolm Turnbull will have left office while media will ignore the links between carrying out Turnbull's suggestions and resulting difficult to stop crime society economies, life will be similar to futuristic Robocop. With more youth and adults that can't find regular employment, society's increasing part time work and time delayed before Centrelink compensation begins, comes not only more crime, as well fewer males would be chancing marrying women that maybe unemployed themselves, leading to more women taking on prostitution. I have a non-existent traumatising school education, hence does not take me long to conclude removing unemployment benefits and/or making unemployment benefits more difficult to obtain results in increasing crime, will turn Australia into a poor place for foreigners to invest in. Prime time news media already spends much of their program time to crime relating to people 99.9% of Australian citizens don't know and I assume don't care to know. I assume news media are merely dummying citizens down with annoying news stories. Giving young journalists opportunities to stand in front of courthouses and/or crime scenes and read out crime stories, big moment in their career life. I'm still talking about the future of unemployment. Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 11:24:35 AM
| |
On November 19, television channel “7mate” showed movie Apollo 13 starring Tom Hanks.
I soon after took considerable time and care to type up 11 detailed somewhat technical theories on why man has not set foot on the moon. I consider whether man has actually set foot on the moon to be evidence that there exists an establishment controlled media and education system devoted to maintaining control over poor thinking skilled world citizenry. That after reading my below attachment, you will realise man has not yet set foot on the moon. “you don't have to be a rocket scientist to work this out” almost treasure Scott Morrison's words while yelling at the opposition, separation between political parties performance on November 21 in federal parliament. I posted the below website page reading on a psychological website “just-for-fun” page, being that parts of the reading is designed to test readers’ awareness of analysing their own ability. http://www.psychforums.com/just-for-fun/topic188583.html steve9 Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 2:26:42 PM
|
Even though many traumatised by educated listeners believe in democratic politics, few busy people care to understand everyday details.
If citizens don't like what's going on, citizens have one chance every three years to take an opportunity to vote in the other bad political party into government.