Politicians including finance media are often scaring citizens with: budget deficit warnings; Rudd's constant reminders of 2008 GFC; 2014 beginning of the last two and half years Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne building boom price “bubble” scares; scaring as in justifying working class into saving money in superannuation funds to finance their own retirement, to have many self-retired workers losing savings, lost due to poor banking regulations and financial advisor laws; global warming, now climate change; terrorism; finance media often reminding readers and listeners of the end of the China 7% GDP boom, using ideas of 200% GDP debt; “Stop the boats” Tony Abbott scares citizens of being over run by foreigners; Greece troubles; North Korean nuclear missions; China claiming the China Sea. All these scary news reports have almost nothing to do with Australian citizens, therefore add zero self-interest intelligent thought to future decisions. Are our politicians constantly distracting citizens with fight and flight scary stories, much the same as old children's horror stories scare children into being more concerned about scary night-time stalking creatures.
http://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/australia/halloween

Teenagers whom watch Horror, add violent crime and war movies are being desensitised to ignore fight and flight emotionally driven instincts/intuition. All political scary stories are ignored as often nothing bad relating to scary stories happens, that as nothing bad happens, politicians may seem to have done something to protect citizens from bad happenings, when politicians didn't actually do anything.

Are news print political cartoon character drawers going to publish selective politicians standing on house porches saying to people answering a knock on a door “trick-a-treat”... politicians trick citizens and citizens treat politicians with starting salaries of almost $200,000 a year, plus generous accommodation allowances (I heard once from serious media) are often used to buy a Canberra second home and generous superannuation contributions.

When said, “to get good talent you need to pay good money” who gets to evaluate good talent other than a poorly educated, vaguely informed voters whose “anti-intellectual; sport cultured” education curriculum is forced onto children by self-interested politically guided bureaucrats.

Have I said it all?

Below reading is about how I strongly suggest, all the money thrown at failed solutions, political statements stating things should be done, yet nothing is done. Embarrassing and scandalising politicians have to do with citizens savings money being lost, that people losing money, there exists limited cost affective solutions for complaining citizenry.

Serious media focuses pretty-well everything that goes wrong back onto government:

Mental health, particularly aboriginal suicides, funding solutions are not translated into better performing statistical results.

October 19 ABCC legislation gets redirected by changing shotgun number of shots in a single load. Whether time taken to quickly place two extra projectile loads in a five shot shotgun, short time taken almost makes the argument of 5 to 7 shots shotguns dramatised importance, very irrelevant. The story would not be the first time irrelevant dramatised information becomes important for media listeners to listen to, gradually wearing down listeners knee-jerk reaction long term willingness to care to listen to stated important information.

I suggest, so many irrelevant concerns and serious depressing violence and murder stories are presented on media that depressed listeners could influence listeners to consider committing suicide.

All media news murder stories and tragic accidents sounds serious, yet have nothing to do with news viewers. Such unfortunate events happen all the time, yet to solve why many people commit suicide alludes media questioners and problem solvers.

Four Corners' host Sarah Ferguson on her “Hitting Home” on family violence, two part series, on her introduction beginning the following QandA program said, “family violence can't be fixed”.

I suggest, government doesn't want family violence solved. Family violence reduces population growth and disturbs wealth through various means from being accumulated. People who are more concerned about their own family violent problems concern themselves far less with real politically unsolved problems.
http://www.abc.net.au/tv/programs/hitting-home/

Local and exampling US election campaigning focuses on each candidates failed performance. Media saying candidates would prefer to focus on the positive campaigning yet negative campaigning is believed to be more effective. Yet, I suggest do nothing politicians can't break detailed promises elected politicians didn't make.

Everything is about money. Capitalism suffers from periodic financial crisis. In between these many financial crisis, there are smaller company bankruptcies; scam artists conning people into parting with their money without providing promised as described services.

Presently a large number of Australian bank borrowing customers are complaining about large sums of money and property being unethically removed from their ownership. Rarely heard by me, media vaguely mentioned bank customer complaints blaming bank financial advisors bad advice and loan forms incorrectly altered, said to maximise lending to customers, to maintain banks triple A ratings from ratings agencies. As seen on a Stephen Long presentation, loan applicants who have fixed incomes in which to service loans, loan applicants incomes were vastly over estimated.

Media's brought up during July 2 federal election campaigning, focused attention towards negative gearing rental property ownership, allowing people with home ownership and limited cash... using record low interest rates to borrow and buy presently booming over priced property. If future tenants fail to be worthy, destroy property causing increased repair costs, few available trades people to repair damaged property before new tenants begin to pay rent. And/or property market valuations fall, causing margin call on loans. Low interest loans need to be called in, property sold in a media news story declining market, a percentage of the money collected from sold property goes to state government taxes. Money not collected from sold property to pay out loans. Family homes need to be sold to make up the money owing to lenders.

The above is not that complex to understand, yet, to people who are more wanting to feel good emotional family huggers of each other, the type of people asking how each other are, not expecting further complex discussion other than “I'm find”.
People who feel childhood education traumas confused by unknown margin call concepts, allow financial advisors advice, guiding easily confused investors wealth into whatever supposed expert market analyst spokesmen tell financial advisors to tell their easily confused investor customers.

Media presented politicians going on about budget deficit concerns, that workers need to save for their retirement years, that government can't afford to support future old age pensioners whom living longer with all the media presented scientific advanced medical cures under study predicted to come onto the market in about 5 years. Elderly people keen to feel good about being self-supporting, take risks on investments, ignorant of what may turn out to be a bad long term investment.

ABC television news financial reporter Alan Kohler may occasionally show what Alan refers to as charts, on selective city house rising prices, charts going as far back as 1977. Charts may indicate rising house prices yet charts may not indicate high turnover and/or low property demand. That houses maybe valued by real estate valuators. Are property prices being overly priced during low demand periods: recessions; politicians and finance media's constant scary economic outlook predictions, by a never mentioned establishment interests in holding back house property from being sold, until planed house buying booms?

Politicians are historically known for talk, “we need to do something”, yet problems under the control of government, never seem to be fixed. North Australian high percentage numbers of Aboriginal youth in detention which has been going on for many years, which would have been reported to government needing solutions for over 100 years.

Without listing a large number of failures. I suggest government failures to solve years of media mentioned problems are used to convince the many people whom have lost money through badly advised investments, unethical banking behaviours, governments are not going to do anything even if government states they're going to fix problems.

Delaying tactics are the best solution where accused run by establishment entities are in the wrong. Like Family Courts are poorly financed and are taking years to process court judgements. The mere idea of lengthening final judgements and expense of glorified expensive legal proceedings, failed legal proceedings ending up in the high court, discourages the many people who feel they have been legally mistreated from attempting to find monetary compensation.

Parliamentary displays during question time to many viewers will conclude democracy is real. To people whom have been mistreated, I assume question time looks like politicians are full of performing misdirecting statements.

The ABC serious media are known for criticising and heavy handed interviewing politicians. The process appears as though there exists separation from government financed ABC media and government, that being anecdotal evidence of real democracies. I strongly suggest, the propaganda is mostly about money, by convincing knee-jerk reactions into audiences memories, that any money lost through various means, depending on government to solve problems, solving problems, will not happen. Seeking legal courtroom justice is a waste of time.

To my occasional viewing, 9 network A Current Affair presents many confidence tricksters whom falsely relieve people of their money. Banks may even come under scrutiny. Yet many people losing money in stories don't seem to have their lost money returned. The culture of excepting fate and moving on without further wounding why theft by trickery continues without legal redress.

One media story about one seemingly rich Australian women seen complaining about how a bank allowed her ex-husband to secure loans using the woman's property assets, leaving her with the debt. She expected to win the high court case against the bank. I have no idea of the end result, yet I ask how did the ex-husband have access to property deeds to secure bank loans. Making the story a little contrived to allow listeners to believe to find justice, complainants may need to go to the high court. Losing court cases against bank's government legislation's legal yet unethical behaviours leading to complainants losing court judgements, paying court costs and legal fees.

The value of Australian justice may be little better than Chinese dictatorship legal system sudden crackdowns.

I am saying all the unsolved everything, convinces citizens whom have lost money, don't bother trying to get the money back. If citizens try, more money will be lost.

…....... on another subject..........

The shape of the not yet built Sydney Crown Casino James Packer high rise building looks very sculptured in a fantasy design. If the building never gets built, was the building ever intended to be built?
http://crownsydney.com.au/

Finance may have been raised, shares sold on the look of a very stylish Crown Casino. The shape of this building would be expensive to build using Australian expensive building industrial labour. Easy to build a square roomed rooms, on top of each other, building. So I suggest the Sydney Casino building design is too over the top to ever have been built. The casino is another Sydney Opera House difficulty to build building.
http://au.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=CWN.AX#symbol=CWN.AX;range=5y

China's crack down on gambling, having Packer's casino executives arrested by Chinese government. Is it the establishment intentionally sending share prices down, relieving share holder investors of some of their money? That the Packer family tree beginning with government licensed media were merely fronting for the establishment's inexhaustible supply of invented bank credits money?

Nathan Tinkler story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Tinkler

Kerry Stokes story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Stokes

Alan Bond story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Bond

How could these above mentioned people achieve so much wealth so quickly? The stories are like rags-to-richers Cinderella stories. All last mentioned three men were working class low achievers indicated by their early professions. There successes are certainly unusual.
This somewhat proves people believe what their told, what feels good to believe Cinderella story must be true. Once told what to believe “feel good truth”, feel good believers can't easily be persuaded to believe something else.