Prior to examinations, students are speed reading through texts books, attempting to remember selective names and dates which may come up in examination questions.

My expressed theory is that academic schooling should not begin before aged 9 years, during an age where emotional self-programming proficient cultural behavioural experiences have been carried out correctly many times for several years before children become consumed by academic studying. Increased maturity aged 9 years children will be more capable of quickly catching up to anything that would have been learnt as children who would have began school aged 5 years. That aged 9 years children would only require 2 hours each day, lasting for 2 years to have achieved capable academic learning before entering university. Children's spare time boredom and curiosity will lead children to read what increasing intelligent brains consider worth reading, finding their own pathway to success: art; playing chess; electronic kits; computer typing up relevant ideas.
Money saved on teacher employment and school buildings would pay for more worthy projects. I'd also suggest most mental illnesses would disappear.
Opposing ideas are that parents want daytime baby sitting services to mind their children.

The easily believing what people were told to believe would also disappear. Political systems, religions and financial boom bust economy mythology would be difficult to have been so easily believed. All the scary stories manipulating citizens, wiser parents would soon tell their children why scary stories were most probably lies.

I'd also suggest governments have much to hide, that government and corporate upper management in the know systems are fearful of losing their status and wealth, that they have interests in keeping the working class ignorant. Even though citizens aren't as dumb as Tudor period citizens, much of the information media inform listeners has replaced Tudor myths, modern citizens intelligence for further curiosity is somewhat similar to the Tudor period.

DNA has 2 metres of DNA information, all of which is crammed into each organic cell. The process between saliva and coming up with one in 7 billion people on earth genetic code. Seeing something that is so very very very small. Working out chemical code sequence. Warrants thought, which I suggest media and news story DNA are lies.

The education system that teaches students to ignore mistakes, quickly moving onto the next question which are often simple trivial pursuit intelligence information... produces a work force whom when workers coming up against unknown obstacles, workers don't care to ask for increased knowledge, which could be embarrassing and/or information will be stressful to learn, instead, fake it. Societies end up with poor productivity, mistakes having to be fixed, buildings falling down, and more whistle blowers exposing real detailed corruption within the corporate and political system.

Construction workers are more trying to entertain themselves (after school thought behaviours) than be aware accidents can happen, walking around blindly.

Tudor period medical theories go back to ancient Greece. Henry VIII could have commissioned a study on how best to medicate his leg, using other English people with similar problems, yet simply believing what doctors said based on ancient Greek readings, displays how avoiding thought, an inability to doubt was absent.

Absent wasn't the correct end of sentence word. sorry. Opposite meaning to absent was correct.

There are many various technical books available to read, children whom are not mentally stressed by school classroom education can read.
What I believe children end up reading are fantasy easy to read books: Harry Potter; Ironman; Green Hornet; comic books. The fantasy hero worship is probably doing more harm than good.

If you have read similar ideas from me before, I'm using "the more you read it the more it becomes true" to convince readers of my finger pointing theories.

On October 27, ABC television The Drum program had a “special” twenty nine minute discussion on family violence.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-27/the-drum-thursday-october-27/7972948

Guests: three women and a man, ranted as in shifting sentences, on for almost twenty nine minutes. Ideas were: “awareness”; “family terrorism”; a percentage of unreported family violence; “no services on the ground”; shifting sentences towards “indigenous”; “governments are finally listening”; male guest said, “works with mothers and sons” and “attachment trauma and DVD programs”; “domestic violence is a community problem”; “getting federal and state on board”; “just demonising isn't going to solve the problem”. One whole lot of short speeches vaguely avoiding saying anything worth realising.
If The Drum topics were: climate change; shark attacks; kangaroos fencing... the panellists sentences would have been similar.

The Drum program name is an ideal name as though when beating a drum the same tone-note sound is continually being heard.

Four panellists were using selective short sentence phrases prompting further previously formulated memories for the next short sentence. The four guest panellists may have gained government funding for counselling programs and women's refuge centres by their limited solutions ranting language skills. Sentences sounding as though words had the beginnings of solutions, ranting for twenty nine minutes without saying anything worth a moment of prolonged thought.

This episode of The Drum should be immortalised as one of the most pointless demonstrations of ranting heard. Such ranting should be brought to the attention of university students, so when similar ranting are recognised, students can demonstrate why they should have money purchased for study course material and lectures returned.

In all the twenty nine minutes heard: I didn't hear the word bipolar; didn't hear any probable causes; causes of anger; did hear that there was no class barriers between professional skills sets; didn't hear any suggested solutions other than more of the same; close to the end of the program jail and rehabilitation was heard.

Does media's violent contact sports and violent entertainment “male verse male” fighting get mentioned, has statistics taken into account seasonal sports between football season and cricket season and/or different countries types of sports. The difference between soccer and rugby league?
Does the Neanderthal human fear instinct for fight or flight emotional reaction, lead the fight resolution get a hearing?

My view is that every person gets angry over something. Anger in a physical sense resolution, forces increased physical effort to solve a delaying problem. The difference is human ability to suddenly stop being angry when suddenly other people become involved.

When people become the cause of anger and frustration, calm verbal communication reasons out problems. In an emotional decision making mind set culture, exampling 4 Corners Nauru Youtube clips... physical conflict shuts the problem up.

Another issue is that bipolar personalities are said to be predominately happy people whom suddenly become angry. I suggest years of trying to be positive covering up frustration self-medicating distractions from time wasting school classroom tasks, repressed anger busts out as planned relationships become unfulfilled. Add to that a sense of self-denial, it's “never their fault”.

It always comes back to the child, yet saying male children see chosen female partners as their right to punish physically weaker females, guides the blame back to male children's male parents, redirecting school education out of the picture.

Take out the male parent theory, I strongly suggest, the problem is that school education has hijacked male children's ability to take the time to rationally think, to correctly plan forty years of marriage, financially supporting a family.

Badly educated humans find change difficult to except. The loss of a happy memory emotion suddenly rejected spouse, amygdala guiding hippocampous quick solving emotional reactions hijacks any rational conclusions to merely move on with their life. Emotion has driven obsessive behaviours to rebuild past memory images, the other spouse has rejected.

The entire family violence problems are school education's constant need for word spelling skills redirecting children's time from experiencing thought. School teachers dealing out curriculum test requirement classroom tasks whom primary school teachers are often female and mothers pushing their male children to do their high school homework, the wealth class and skill set barriers lead back to females dominating powerless male children.
A percentage of males will respect and may even fear their mother yet take repressed anger reactions using violence, out on the wife.

The Drum special program on family violence had absolutely no theoretical psychological meaningful reasons for why family violence happens, which makes the entire discussion a load of meaningless political ranting.