Mikk,

The liar's party incl Back stabber bill supported a plebiscite in 2013, but now have changed their mind.

They certainly don't give a crap about gay marriage.

AJ Philips,

Since when was I obliged to answer you? You will always disagree with anything I say and that's OK but, as I have already told you, I am not going to play your silly games. There is no point. Give your contrary opinions to anything I post by all means, but do not expect me to respond to you. There is simply and clearly no point in doing so. You are never going to change what I think any more than I could change your viewpoint - which I have know intention of trying to do.

One final thing. You are purely and simply a troll, and I will not even glance at your posts in future.

ttbn,

At no point have I suggested that you are.

<<Since when was I obliged to answer you?>>

I merely highlighted the fact that you repeated discredited claims straight after they had been discredited. Had you instead made different claims, then I would have addressed those instead. My response was in no way motivated by a need for acknowledgement from you.

<<You will always disagree with anything I say and that's OK…>>

Not necessarily. I disagree with what you say because what you say is always wrong. That’s the trouble with being old and having outdated ideas that have since been shown to be wrong and no longer work, I guess. It has nothing to do with the fact that you are the one saying it.

<<… but, as I have already told you, I am not going to play your silly games.>>

I am not playing games here. I am very serious.

<<Give your contrary opinions to anything I post by all means, but do not expect me to respond to you.>>

I will, and I won’t. Thank you. Besides, I thought we had already agreed that you wouldn’t respond to me:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=18469#328255

<<You are never going to change what I think any more than I could change your viewpoint - which I have know intention of trying to do.>>

If you ever happen to be right about something at some point in the future, then you can change my point of view with evidence and reasoned argument. I guess that’s the difference between you and I.

<<You are purely and simply a troll …>>

Clearly you don’t know what a troll is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

<<… and I will not even glance at your posts in future.>>

Good, this’ll make my job a lot easier. Of course, not being a troll, my goal isn’t to provoke a response from you, so ignoring me won’t stop me discrediting your nonsense.

wasn't to long back that Penny Wong supported 'traditional' marriage. Same goes for many of Labour. The only people with any integrity in this is those who have consistently opposed the destruction marriage. Seems like now the 70% in favour of 'gay ' marriage was always one of those distorted numbers that the regressives believed if repeated long and often enough people would believe.

If they really believed that 70% of Australians supported SSM as they have been shouting at us until now, they would have welcomed a plebicite with open arms and cries of joy. But they don't seem to believe their own propaganda any more.