Dear phanto,

I can't argue with your logic.

It is indefencable.

Oh for goodness sake Phanto will you lighten up!
Foxy was just messing with you, as was I, and you are just too serious for your own good.
Now why not repeat my statement above and then dissect it to your advantage?

I have no doubt all this 'storm in a teacup' story is as a result of all the nasty educated, feminist women in the world who are out to upset all the men and take over this patriarchal world.
Yep, no doubt about it...

The NSW Labor grub Jamie Clements has resigned as General Secretary of the party. The failure of Mr 15% (that his support rating for Premier) Luke Folly (NSW Opposition Leader for those that don't know) has serious ramifications for the next election, Folly had next to no chance of winning before the Clements debacle, now that has sunk down to zero! Folly was shown to be completely indecisive and dismissive about the whole affair, now he will have to pay the price, handing Baird another four years as Primer.
A host of state Labor luminaries had been calling for Clements head for some time. Acting Party leader Linda Burney, Lukey boy is on holidays, was forthright in demanding Clements resignation. All I can say for Folly is, Luke if that's a half decent place where you are, I suggest you stay there, permanently! Your actions, or lack of, has shown you would make a very poor state leader indeed.

Suzeonline:

“Oh for goodness sake Phanto will you lighten up!”

It seems my exchange with Foxy has really gotten under your skin. Why would it bother you so much unless there was some truth in what I have said?

“Foxy was just messing with you”

Foxy herself has already said that so why do you need to tell me as well? Are you trying to support Foxy because you think she is too fragile to support herself? Are you patronising her again? I wonder why she has not taken you to task over such patronising behaviour towards her or is it a case of the good ol’ girls needing to bind together even if one of them feels the need to patronise the other?

“, as was I,”

So which part was ‘messing’? When I asked you whether Gayle had been treated unjustly you agreed that he was. Was that just messing? We are trying to have a discussion about that issue of injustice which in my opinion is a serious issue. So how will we know in the future when you are seriously responding or when you are just ‘messing’. Why would we bother to read your posts when you are so ambiguous about your intentions? Why come here to mess with people there are many more appropriate places to do that?

“ and you are just too serious for your own good.”

If I am too serious for my own good then why bother reading my posts at all? You are so hypocritical about this. So many times have you tried to criticise me for my personal traits and yet you seem completely unable to ignore my posts. If I am as bad as you make out then why do you bother with me at all? Every time you respond to me you look more and more of a hypocrite with seemingly no self-control.

“Now...then dissect it to your advantage?”

Why do I need an advantage? I come here to have a discussion on relevant topics – not to win anything. Is that why you come here?

You know what Phanto, you are absolutely right.
I will do as you suggest.
Have a fabulous day.

Suseonline:

No need to tell me - just do it.