The Forum > General Discussion > Gayle-gate
Gayle-gate
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
People seem horrified because it happened in the work place but what is wrong with that? If a man asks his workmate in the next cubicle would he like to go fishing on the weekend is that a crime? No workplace would stop that from happening. Women seem to want to be able to control what men will look at them, talk to them or invite them out. It seems it is a good thing if you like the other person but if you do not like him then he is ‘sleazy’ and it is harassment. Repeated asking when the woman says no is harassment.
The question is the same whoever puts it and the answer is always a simple yes or no. Trying to make it in to some gender bashing exercise shows how precious some women have become and how much they want to control men.
The question of his ‘reputation’ is dragged into the fight to put him down. If he has a reputation then why has nothing been done in the past? Obviously what he has done has not been sufficiently bad to warrant punishment and so should not be taken into account when dealing with this incident. What kind of justice system takes into account a person’s reputation before handing out penalties? The judgement should be on the facts as presented in a particular incident.
The cricket administration should be ashamed of themselves. They have shown themselves to be afraid of opinion and do not stand for justice and a person’s right to be treated according to genuine values.