Bazz, I can't recall that being on TV or in the papers, but I'm pretty sure she didn't mean we were worse than Saudi. More likely she meant we were giving then an excuse to ignore all the criticism we make.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Is Mise, how did you get this site to accept multiple exclamation marks? It's always rejected them whenever I've tried.

The difference between a Muslim and Islam.

• Islam : the meaning comes from the Arabic verbal noun (like a gerund) s-l-m. When appropriate vowel markers are added the word Islam appears. The etymology of s-l-m is to submit, accept, or surrender. From this comes Islam’s conventional definition of surrender to God.
• Muslim : also has its roots in the s-l-m verb. It is a participle of the verb and refers to a person who engages in the act of submission, acceptance, or surrender. Therefore a Muslim is a person who submits to the will of God, or a follower of Islam.

Extremism is rife in Australia and needs to be treated the same as terrorists that do not like our way of life, and will do us harm. The far right ideology is dangerous and without a conscious direction. Abbott was a perfect example of an out of control mind. He could not see past his own ideology at any cost.
These actions have awoken a group of like-minded Australian citizens with out of control intent, they need to be found and handled with caution, or shot on site. This is far worse than any other situation in Australia today.

579,
The whole 'sovereign citizen' agenda is a load of crap.
Its hegelian dialectic - problem, reaction, solution - to justify domestic spying.

Look at this article, they are just repeating US talking points.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-30/australias-sovereign-citizen-terrorism-threat/6981114

'People that make home-made number plates'
That's as pathetic as the US saying people who pay in cash are potential terrorists.

The report also states that in 2012, sovereign citizens threatened to burn down the home of a judge and "cause harm with firearms" and had "plans to murder Sheriff Officers if they attempt to seize property".

This is talking about US civil forfeiture which US citizens should stand up against.

Now they want to use some 73 year old man as the poster child for sovereign citizen.
Yes he seems like a bit of a troublemaker, but really??

Then the article mentions the Southern Poverty Law Center.
This is the organisation causing all the race baiting in the US.

The whole article and everything its based upon is an agenda and load of garbage.

Its about scaring people into not standing up or having a say in what they believe in, and to give in to the whole PC crap instead.

Oh Dear, Sovereign citizens, what Next !!
The world has gone stark raving mad.
Give them the option of living on an island with their other sovereigns
and see how long before they have a whole flock of rules to keep the peace.

Persons that think they are above the law, serial pests that think they do not have to pay fines, drive without a license, back-chat police and other authority, fake number plates, Threaten authority when they come to confiscate goods to recover costs, arms, drugs and thieves, and anything else that is illegal.

No regard for the law that protects everybody else. That is not acceptable, and threatens the lives of law abiding citizens.

Smart ass tactics to confuse courts and police as to identity or where they live. Police and courts are a victim of information collecting, without proper ID they are hamstrung. We do not have laws to cover that situation, so they must be classified as terrorists and treated accordingly.
If you think that is not happening here, you are lost or do not care. Just another group that are going to cost us taxpayers plenty, and they would not care or give two hoots, because they are above the law.

579,
I usually ignore your ravings, but your condition is worsening.

You really should not forget to take your medication.

But you do add a little humour to the site. Like the other bloke here who is upset that it is against our law to ride a bike without a helmet.

Once we had to go to the Sydney Domain on Saturday arrvo to listen to the eccentrics or see their chalked messages on footpaths.

You sure do illustrate Labor intellect.