' Would someone tell A.J. Philips, the scientific facts of the reproductive organs, and why there are two genders. '

Pseudo science is AJ's speciality

Would somebody tell Josephus that human sexuality and biology are a little more complicated than just reproduction and its results?

http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=origins+of+homosexuality
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/300145?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1691850/pdf/15539346.pdf

Of course, as a creationist, and someone who thinks that he has been informed otherwise by the creator of the entire universe, that’s going to be very difficult difficult.

<<I wouldn't allow A.J Philips to teach my children, yes I am discriminating because I believe in biological reality.>>

You may “believe in biological reality”, but for your beliefs to be accurate, you first need an understanding of biology that extends beyond ‘Where Did I Come From?’

<<Are most effeminate homosexuals developed from how they were toilet trained?>>

No, there is no credible evidence for that. And even if that were the case, it wouldn't say much for the all-powerful being that you get your information from.

<<Do Bike gangs that practice homosexual acts do it for brotherly bonding not from being born homosexual?>>

They may wear tight pants, but that’s for good reasons and just because the tight Lycra gear is a little emasculating, that is in no way indicative of their sexuality.

But if you mean "biker" gangs, then I'm afraid you're a little confused. The videos you've been watching actually belong to what is referred to as the "Gay bear" scene. They mostly only dress like bikers.

But hey, there's nothing to be ashamed of, Josephus. America's deep south is the most Christian part of the country and they're the biggest consumers of gay porn in America (http://wtvr.com/2014/03/13/bible-belt-states-watch-the-most-gay-porn-stats-show).

In fact those who are the most vocal against homosexuality tend to be the ones wrestling the most with feelings that their religion is telling them they shouldn't be feeling (think Ted Haggard). Off the record, I reckon it has something to do neutralising a guilty conscience. But that's not a professional opinion.

//the scientific facts of the reproductive organs, and why there are two genders//

Oh dear. Here we go again.

Hey Josephus, have I ever told you the joke about the sadistic necrophiliac with a taste for bestiality, or that would just be flogging a dead horse?

//As all alternatives are a perversion of the physical reality.//

It is bad enough that you keep spouting nonsense about biology and that I have to keep putting you back in your box. But biology isn't really my favourite branch of science.

If you start talking shyt about physics, I will go super saiyan and you will cry foul like you always do after you've provoked people.

//He does not want to face the scientific facts//

There's the pot calling the kettle an excellent absorber of visible EM radiation.

//I am discriminating because I believe in biological reality.//

No you don't: we've been over this. You believe that mammals sexually reproduce, except for one special case of parthenogenesis about 2000 years ago. I agree with the first bit; the parthenogenesis argument is still hotly debated. You don't believe that homosexuality is a natural behaviour of many mammalian species including homo sapiens. On that point you are clearly incorrect: homosexuality is biological reality.

//Are most effeminate homosexuals developed from how they were toilet trained?//

WTF?

//Do Bike gangs that practise homosexual acts do it for brotherly bonding not from being born homosexual?//

I'll give you half my life savings if you walk up to a bikie and tell him you think he's a poof. That should cover the funeral costs and leave some left over for your poor grieving widow.

Toni Lavis,

The whole toilet training bit is an old discredited Freudian idea. I used to use it too when I was a Christian.

Suse,

With training, you can learn a lot about people's personlities by how they express themselves. I now know enough about AJ Philips to realise his problem, and that there is no point in engaging him any longer.

ttbn,

Thank you for once again demonstrating that your entire rebuttal has been nothing more than one big ad hominem in lieu of any evidence for your claims. Not the least being your original claim.

To your credit, though, I think it is at least wise of you to now quit while you're... well, before you make things any worse for yourself anyway.

Or perhaps you are simply "taking your ball and going home"? (You see? Now that IS an idiom.)