I know what you meant, runner. But do you have any evidence for this clarified assertion of yours?

'The Gay Report, published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979, revealed that 73 percent of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger.5 (5. K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275. '

Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population. they constitute about a third of child molesters.6 (6. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3443, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia," op. cit. Also, K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10 (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet. )

A nationwide investigation of child molestation in the Boy Scouts from 1971 to 1991 revealed that more than 2,000 boys reported molestations by adult Scout leaders. (Note: The Scouts, who have 150,000 Scoutmasters and assistant Scoutmasters, ban hundreds of men each year from scouting out of concern that they might abuse boys.)8 (8. Patrick Boyle, Scout's Honor (Rocklin, Calif.: Prima Publishing, 1994), p. 3l6. )

'A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30 percent of those studied admitted to having engaged In homosexual acts as adults, and 91 percent of the molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual.9 (9. W. L. Marshall, et al., "Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters," Journal of interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336, cited in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't Want You to see," Colorado for Family Values Report, Vol. 14, March 1994. )'

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Charles B. Johnson, Ph.D., conducted a content study of the personal ads in the Advocate, the national gay and lesbian newsmagazine and discovered that "chickens," a common term for underage boys sought for sex, were widely solicited. Many of the advertisements in the magazine solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of prostitution ads.10 (10. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., "A Content Analysis of 'The Advocate,"' unpublished manuscript p. 18, quoted in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't WantYou to See," ibid. )

Really Runner?
We can all find sites online that prove our points, but I found one that totally debunk all your flawed so-called scientific research results.

Check it out yourself. It remains a well known fact that one doesn't need to be homosexual to be attracted to male children. That is a false 'fact' put out there by hysterical Christian fundamentalist intellectually challenged folk...

Psychology.ucdavis.edu

"The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children."

Of course, all the scientists of today could be wrong, and you right, but I seriously doubt it.

Sorry Runner, the link I wanted to illustrate above is here:

http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html

//In voting to condone perversion more kids will be fiddled with.//

Wasn't the vote to legalise same sex marriage, not kiddy-fiddling? I don't see how allowing gays to marry is going to encourage them to fiddle kiddies. Can you explain how this is supposed to work, runner?

Because prohibiting Catholic Priests from marriage doesn't seem to have discouraged them from kiddy-fiddling. Some people argue that the exact opposite is true. So which is it? Does allowing marriage encourage kiddy-fiddling or does prohibiting marriage encourage kiddy-fiddling? Could it be that neither is the case, and kiddy-fiddlers are just sickos who will fiddle kiddies no matter what their marital status?