con't

According to the 2011 census, 476,291 people, or 2.2% of the total Australian population, are Muslims. 4.5% of Great Britain is Muslim. Most of the Third World asylum seekers are Muslim.

Although its not a controlled or coordinated plot, Islamic countries are becoming over populated and the worst off are crossing borders to survive. Its Islamic expansionism by default.

Small populated countries such as Australia and New Zealand simply cannot afford to accept the responsibility for relocating these unfortunates without risking their values, their societies, and their way of life.

The problems in Great Britain is a prime example of what we can expect if we allow 50,000 boat people into Australia per annum over the next 10 years. 50,000 is a small number by world standards.

You would think that all of those buff young men and male youths who deal with criminal people smuggling gangs and plot and scheme to trick western democracies into allowing them in would instead think of their female relatives back home. Y'know, standing up for their women and siblings and getting them some education and release from the abomination of tent dresses and the like.

That is instead of running off to stand in the 'Wonderful Centrelink' queue and trying to introduce the Sharia law in their host country to subjugate more women and kids.

Conservative Hippie, do you agree with the actions of some Asian countries re turning back out to sea boatloads of obviously starving, dehydrated and sick people, with no one on board qualified to sail the boat?

To my mind, that is murder on a grand scale.

Foxy, now tell us what that biased, eurocentric report found in relation to people's attitudes toward illegal immigration? Wasn't the figure in the same ballpark of 80% against allowing boat arrivals to settle here?
"Immigrants" is a broad term, what would the results be if the questionnaire got into specifics about race, ethnic origin and religion?
What do Aboriginals think of Tongans? What do Chinese think of Vietnamese? Indians of Lebanese?

Hi Suseonline

In answer to your question I do not like the actions of some Asian countries turning back out to sea boatloads of obviously starving, dehydrated and sick people, with no one on board qualified to sail the boat.

I've answered your question, so its only fair I expect you will answer mine: Can you please provide the number of boat people refugees you would feel comfortable allowing into Australia over the next five years?

I ask this question to gauge how far apart we are on this issue. If you are thinking 1000-10,000 people that's one thing, but if you have no problem with letting a 1,000,000 come, then we are on very different wave lengths. Please be honest, tell us what you feel is acceptable, maybe we have you wrong

"Why not do your own random survey and go into any shopping mall and ask 10 people if we should throw the borders wide open to all comers? Ask if they have any problem with the number of Muslims doubling in this country via boat people arrivals? If you get 8 out 10 agreeing with the above poll, I'll run around the block naked waving a rainbow flag."

Is that a promise, ToryPussy (ConservativeHippie)? Will you really do a nudie run (you may carry the flag of your choice - I favour the St. Andrews Cross, even though I'm a 4th generation Aussie) if you don't get the result you're hoping for?

The restaurant in which I work is closed on Mondays. I'm quite happy to conduct my own random survey, and I'm quite happy to report the results on this website. Are you happy to pay the forfeit you promised if things don't work out in your favour?