Beach, you have absolutely no knowledge of The Greens, what so ever, other than what you can glean from your ever exhaustive naval gazing. As usual you pontificate on this subject, as you do on every other forum subject, being the ever present expert that you are. Besides how much can one observe from the vantage point of a dingy basement in Tempe, nothing! There can't be too many factions in your party with only three members... you, Ross and Doctor Jim.

Thoroughly concur with everything that On the Beach said in his preceeding post.
I knew some of the Conservationist Greens before the Lee Rhiannon blitzkreig and there thinking was miles away from today's Greens.

How you going with the Feral Dog jokes, Paul, got down to the guts of it yet?

Is Mise, yes you can not speculate as to the Shooters meaning of "genuine reason" or "firearm", no one can, as no meaning is given. You also freely admit you have no idea as to how many additional dangerous weapons would be unleashed into the general community by the irresponsible Shooters Party policies, true no one has any such idea.
I must also assume you can not tell me how many additional murders, accidental homicides and suicides will take place as as consequence of this half baked Shooters policy, if it were to be introduced. How many more, and how often, could we expect "Port Arthur's" to occure, or others, as evil as Ivan Milat, to go on a murderous gun rampage, again I am sure, like the Shooters, you have no idea.
With the introduction of the dumb down Shooters policy, could we expect to embrace the American experience of almost daily shootings in schools, burger bars and small town communities, I am sure we could. On a positive note, with such a policy, a minuscule number of blood lust enthusiasts could enjoy their favorite recreational activity of killing defenseless animals, then with all that human carnage going on in the community, no one will notice.
Is Mise and Beach, I appreciate your concern for sheep and wild dogs etc, however it is a pity such concern does not extend to the human population.

Was that all your own work, Paul, or do you have Sandalplank's ghost writer do it for you?

Here's a post copied from another forum:

"Re: When the Greens lie they like to keep it going
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2015, 07:07:17 AM »

The lies are still up on the Greens' NSW site.

Takes them a while to get the message, or do they hope that if they leave it up long enough it will become 'truth'?

The Greens are unique though, the only slime with legs."

Is Mise, you say from another forum. is that the forum run by the National Socialists? Was it posted by a Nazi? We Greens have broad shoulders and such abuse is of no consequence to us.

There could be another agenda for those from the extreme right in wanting lax gun laws. We often point to the United States and its uncontrolled guns, but there is worse, Pakistan!

There is an old saying in Pakistan, many sons and many guns! The attitude towards guns in Pakistan is to say the least wow, just great. In fact the laws are probably more lax than the US. In the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, you can own ROCKET LAUNCHERS, you can install ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS on your roof without a licence. However, in most other areas, the laws are different.
Basically a license is needed to own guns. It is quick to obtain, requires no genuine reason, and after that you can basically just go crazy and buy anything from Full-auto AKs to single shot revolvers, what ever you like, hand grenades are common household items. Also did I mention that you can carry your guns anywhere. Yep, as long as they remain concealed they are good to go. People in Pakistan wanted the right to own guns and it is even constitutionally protected. This is defiantly a gun owners paradise! When it comes to guns will Australia become the next Pakistan? If some here had their way it would be a certainty. And I haven't even mentioned Somalia, where anything goes. Is the Shooters and Hooters Party in Government over there?