The Forum > General Discussion > The Hypocrisy of Selective Precaution
The Hypocrisy of Selective Precaution
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
"The thing I find most interesting is it's the very ones who are so concerned about so called man-made global warming (Lefties and Greenies), who have no opposition to allowing more Muslims into the country. It's rather telling that where they advocate a precautionary principle to promote CO2 reduction, they are totally against using the same precautionary principle when it comes to avoiding the undeniable long term problems associated with Muslim immigration."
I agree.
Why do these people not believe the experience and warnings from England, France, Germany, the Netherlands have any relevance in Australia? Why are they so willing to gamble with our way of life for the sake of people that are essentially anti-democratic?
Whether or not the earth's global temperature increases by the IPCC's estimated 1-2 degrees over the next 100 years actually presents a life threatening concern is questionable. However the increasing Muslim population around the globe over the next 100 years is certain and will certainly impact/influence the societies in countries where the balance shifts in their favour.
This is not a matter of paranoia, racism or xenophobia - its the fact.
Another fact - ISIS members consider themselves Muslims and the true defenders of Islam. ISIS members practice an extreme/fundamental version of Islam, they are therefore Muslim whether we like it or not. Silly people in the defence of non-extreme Muslims can't kick ISIS members out of their religion. Saying ISIS, IS or ISIL are not real Muslims is just stupid, especially when coming from a non-Muslim.