The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Has the term feminism run its course?

Has the term feminism run its course?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 28
  15. 29
  16. 30
  17. All
Foxy,
Yeah, but the people who post on this site are a cut above the rest so we can see things from multiple perspectives, the bulk of electors are stupid and they vote for stupid reasons, Abbott got a poll boost over the MH17 disaster and Howard over Tampa.
Julie Bishop seems to be a decent, capable, intelligent woman who's good at her job...but that's all, she has no charisma, she's elegant and articulate but not engaging.
When you live in a society with universal suffrage and compulsory voting you get anomalies like Jacquie Lambie and Ricky Muir on the blockhead end of the spectrum and Nick Xenophon and Andrew Wilkie at the opposite end. It's a choice between a plate of yabbies and a beer or a piece of perch and a spumante, what we really need is a nice sashimi platter with a glass of champagne...every day.
You don't get to eat well by letting idiots vote.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 5:03:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Good old Clementine Ford has made a list of the things patriarchy has done for women and why Julie Bishop should be grateful, good, saves me doing it:
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/whats-so-wrong-with-being-a-feminist-20141103-11g2dw.html
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 5:08:51 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Jay,

But in a representative democracy such as ours
even "idiots" are entitled to representation.
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 5:09:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Jay,

Thanks for the link.

Excellent article.

Perhaps you'd better re-read it.
Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 5:22:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Poirot>> Perhaps you should tell daughterofgloin that she has all the empowerment and equal rights to sign herself onto this forum and post under her own username - progress!(saves confusion)<<

I believe it was a one off thing P.
Posted by sonofgloin, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 6:29:07 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,
Sure but idiots should be ruled by their betters,not their peers, trade unions were supposed to be the vehicle for political the expressions of the lumpenproles, without that guidance and basic political education they're no longer fit to vote at all.
You're smart, don't you find people of even "average" intelligence insufferable?

Re Clementine Ford, you'll notice that societies where formal equality is enforced with a gun in your back are the most enduring patriarchal systems? Ford's article could be re-titled "Things our fathers gave us".
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Tuesday, 4 November 2014 7:07:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Page 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. ...
  14. 28
  15. 29
  16. 30
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy