The Forum > General Discussion > The Great Burqa Debate
The Great Burqa Debate
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Page 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- ...
- 47
- 48
- 49
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Monday, 6 October 2014 11:52:52 AM
| |
Poirot, you have to realise that Jayb is still digesting Andrew Bolt from the weekend, and just this morning followed that with a long Alan Jones session, after spending 2 hours reading his Holy Bible the Daily Telegraph.
Posted by May May, Monday, 6 October 2014 12:07:14 PM
| |
I think this is my fourth post in 24 hours - but what a sacrifice !
Gloriously off-topic (but not quite), I recommend this Guardian article: http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/oct/05/female-tv-detectives-move-over-morse Now, there's a new theme for a TV detective drams series: a beautiful Muslima in a nikab, who has battled her way up to Detective-Inspector, and has to work in some academic or bureaucratic city (say, Canberra) against the headwind of a team of utterly useless professional Soy-Lattes and Greens. I'd watch that ! Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 6 October 2014 12:36:26 PM
| |
'Runner, you are a disgusting individual suggesting women couldn't 'find a husband' because they were ugly. What do mean by 'fell prey to predators"?
People who are ugly on the inside are the most awful people on this earth... ' Susie if you call being swept off your feet by a man ( converting to his religion) only to find out that he had other wives elswhere not predatory behaviour I don't know what is. Maybe you would like to apologise for your disgusting conclusion although I doubt you have it in you. and yes the reason she was swept off her feet was she seemed have much difficulty finding a man. She was soon dumped after being, used by such a ( ). This is not an uncommon occurance among muslims something you obviously refuse to believe largely due to your Christophobic nature. Posted by runner, Monday, 6 October 2014 12:45:45 PM
| |
MM: you have to realise that Jayb is still digesting Andrew Bolt from the weekend,
I read the Courier Mail & the Sunday mail. I couldn't tell you who wrote what article. I never look at who the writer is. Oh I like that girl writer that writes a funny page in the Lift out in the Sunday Mail. Forget her name. I just read the article, if I agree with it all well & good, if I don't, Same Same, but different. Sometimes I'll agree with parts & disagree with other parts. I couldn't tell left from right based on what they say. I don't listen to the Radio either, Haven't got time for that. I put the Reel to Reel on down in the shed & sing along all day. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 6 October 2014 1:22:36 PM
| |
Speaking about, and contrasting with, Catholic Nun's and the former 'habits' they wore, with that of the Burqa ? To my recollection I've NEVER seen any of the varieties of Nun's former 'habits' that completely covered their faces ?
Perhaps my memory is truly fading however, does anyone remember an order of Nuns that wore their headwear so large it almost looked like a large white 'sail' ? I hasten to add, I mean no disrespect by this simple enquiry ? I vaguely recall seeing them in France, as well as here in Oz ? Posted by o sung wu, Monday, 6 October 2014 1:23:04 PM
|
What "problems"?
(Aside from the conflated domestic threat constantly tooted by the govt?)
Advice: take a little tour of Oz news sites over the last week...and you'll find plenty of "dinky di" Aussies causing grief and harm to each other.
Then go and have a cuppa and a lie down - and try not to think of any politically motivated scare-mongering shouted from the rooftops by the govt (even if it does float your boat:)