The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Big mistake removing carbon tax

Big mistake removing carbon tax

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
*Why would anyone want one of those in Oz? There is no way they can get a decent V8 into one.
As for the Nissan Leaf, the only places they can sell any have either huge taxpayer subsidies on the things, or special conditions, like congestion charges.*

Well one good reason would be as below.

We are closing down refineries so even the small amount of oil we have left has to be shipped overseas to be refined and then shipped back.
Google “export land model” and it will explain how other countries will stop exporting to Australia as their oil runs low and that is excluding the much higher price that oil will be by then.
Australia WILL be out of oil by 2020
Without oil, modern civilisation doesn’t work
by Mark O’Connor
Treasury’s last Inter-generational Report http://archive.treasury.gov.au/igr/igr2010/report/html/07_Chapter_6_A_sustainable_society.asp
contains, hidden away on page 91, a simple stunning statement: Australia’s oil will be gone by 2020. The timing could not be worse. By 2020 Peak Oil is likely to have rendered oil imports precarious and costly. And without oil, modern civilisation doesn’t work.
The media ignored this part of the Report, so the ministers of our two major parties and the bureaucrats who advise them, have rarely been required to explain why they let this happen. On those rare occasions the question has been brushed aside with assurances that either market forces will always supply oil (or a substitute) at reasonable prices or Australia has vast reserves of natural gas.
Posted by Robert LePage, Monday, 21 July 2014 9:51:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"BTW, it now appears that the temperature rise precedes the CO2 rise. Chickens and eggs anybody?"

Bazz, there is a great deal in the scientific literature about this. You should read it before you comment.
Out-of-context comments mislead and misinform people.
Although I don't think you are, some people here do it intentionally.
Posted by DavidK, Monday, 21 July 2014 12:05:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Davidk, yes I am aware of the controversy over which came first.
However it is so fundamental that it should be hammered down for good.
I heard a talk by a scientist of very considerable note just last week
that made that point.

Robert, the prices in the US & UK I quoted are before subsidy prices.
In the US they get a tax credit in the UK citizens get a fixed sum.
I would pay their unsubsidised prices but not the Great Australian Ripoff.

Quote Robert;
The media ignored this part of the Report, so the ministers of our two major parties

Yes indeed I have spoken to pollies and I feel they are totally
aware of the problem. Just like the pressure put onto the EIA by the
US government to "Don't frighten the horses" to play down peak oil,
so our pollies do not want to frighten the voter by talking about
such terrifying things as petrol rationing, food shortages etc.

When discussing the problem there seems to be a well rehearsed mantra
of "We have good solid commercial arrangements etc etc" and "No
shortage is thought likely in the foreseeable future".

Are these the phrases you hear ? I certainly got the same wording
from three different politicians.
I even suggested to two of the pollies that the owner of a car should
be issued a card that he had to present when buying petrol or diesel
and each purchase be transmitted to the rationing computer and his
ration deducted from his entitlement.

I could see that this was beyond the pale to them, one even remarked
the public would not stand for it !
My suggestion was they should just plan it in case as if Iran closed
the Strait of Hormuz (it was a hot topic at the time) they would only
have a couple of weeks to have it working.

I thought we paid politicians to do this sort of thing to protect
the public just in case.
Are not the armed forces an insurance policy ?
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 21 July 2014 2:15:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bazz, there is no significant controversy, except in the minds of a few so called 'contrarian' scientists.

Why didn't you name him/her?
Posted by DavidK, Monday, 21 July 2014 3:50:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well, I would not put his name up here without his permission.
So I guess you will just have to take my word for it.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 21 July 2014 4:41:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bazz yes there is a problem in relation to the availability of conventional oil but you are mistaken in thinking that it is an immediate problem. We may well have reached peak oil globally, but that means we have still have a similar amount left compared to the amount we have already burnt. There are plenty of unconventional oil sources such as tar sands which we have barely touched. We also have alternatives such as
making petrol from coal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_sands
http://www.tarsandsworld.com/australia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_liquefaction

It is quite likely that these alternative resources will be exploited, but by exploiting them we will go way past the target for emissions that the scientists suggest we can practically adapt too. The obvious solution is a price on CO2 emissions and incentives to move to a low carbon economy. So what does our government do, it acts to discourage taking any sensible steps to deal with the problem
Posted by warmair, Monday, 21 July 2014 5:17:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy