Banjo,
Not even real 'sceptics' doubt the impact of GHG's.
Corollary: You don't want to believe the facts if it goes against your (political) beliefs.

Hasbeen,
If you did do a 'bit of math' you wouldn't be saying what you're saying.
Corollary: You haven't done the 'math'.

Bazz'
What makes you think CO2 is saturated?
Corollary: you don't understand the 'math' either.

Bye for now.

DavidK; just the graphs I have seen. Do not know if their baseline is
correct but the principle I believe is correct and I understand that
it is a critical arguing point.

Can you refer me to other graphs you may think are correct ?

Bazz,

The graphs you have seen are correct ONLY IF the atmosphere is saturated with CO2.

It isn't (Earth is not Venus).

So, it is NOT a critical arguing point - despite some people saying/thinking it is.

You want graphs?

Just search: "greenhouse effect" or "Earth's radiative imbalance" or "top of atmosphere" or "radiation budget" or etc.

If one has really done the 'math', one would know that the mathematics is correct.

Well, I stick to my beliefs that confidence will increase, along with business confidence now that they monkey is off their backs.

Add to this the huge boost about to hit QLD with the CSG industry going into production phase, and things will turn around.

.....Yes, it is a global issue butcher - and many other countries, states and tiers of government and progressive big-businesses are addressing the issues 'accordingly'. We should be a part of that.

Agree David, but you don't be a part of something by introducing the worlds largest carbon tax.

......Tell me do you simply dismiss the greenhouse effect and if so why?

For what it's worth warmair, I do think climate change is real, but, it's a global problem, not just an Australian problem, which according to the recent election, appears to be a position shared by the majority of voters and as has been said, how dumb is Bill Shorten in stating he will reintroduce a carbon tax if he wins government. And he's apparently the best they've got. That's scary!

My last on the matter. You people made a fetish of "peer review", then so scammed the process that it became meaningless.

Even so, the latest peer reviewed research says;

Doubling atmosphere CO2 can increase temperature by no more than 1 C degree.

CO2 displaces water vapor in the upper atmosphere, CO2 must thus be a cooling agent.

Billions of dollars have been spent on trying to prove CO2 is a problem, with not a single bit of evidence. If evidence existed, your lot would be screaming about it, not hiding the frauds you have committed.

The greatest concentration of CO2 is over forests, not industrial areas.

Every report by the IPCC has had to step back from previous forecasts, but still tell porkies.

All IPCC reports are political documents, written by politicians, not scientists, bearing little resemblance to their own scientific papers.

If you are a scientists, grow a backbone, & expose the fraud for what it is.

So called scientists who still subscribe to the theory are either stupid or disgusting frauds.