The Forum > General Discussion > The Silence of the left...
The Silence of the left...
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Page 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- ...
- 47
- 48
- 49
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 12:43:23 PM
| |
On page 28 and then yet again on page 30, I asked Shadow Minister to give us any other pre election lie from Gillard other than "no carbon tax". Finally on page 30 SM in his eventual reply showed he could not even name *ONE* other pre election lie from Gillard. Poor "old" SM tried and tried, but he could not list one other actual pre election lie.
Whereas, I had previously pointed out 28, yes that's right *TWENTY EIGHT*, unmitigated, outright pre election lies from ToneLIAR ... not one of which SM has been capable of refuting. CASE CLOSED. SM, also asked me on page 30 to name "one" promise that Gillard kept. Ok SM here's "one" for you ..... the plain packaging of cigarettes. (See SM, the difference between you and I is that I can actually answer questions). There's no doubt, all of Australia now knows that ToneLIAR is the biggest LYING PM in the history of Australian politics. Posted by Nhoj, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 12:55:23 PM
| |
Hi Poirot,
Okay, I apologise, never again. But as you quote me, http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6413#190161 "However, and slightly off-topic, I am concerned that this topic gets so much comment compared to this simultaneous thread:" "concerning the imminent hanging of a Christian woman in Sudan, as soon as her baby is weaned, i.e. when she turns two years old. The woman had to give birth while shackled, and will remain in Omdurman prison for ..... oh, just a bit under two years now." I don't apologise for that: I'm amazed how few - 'Left' or right - have commented on that thread. That poor woman now has about three weeks short of two years left before she is hanged, since according to the Koran, a child is to be weaned at two years of age, at which point its mother can safely be hanged. No comment, Poirot ? Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 1:11:55 PM
| |
poirot: concerning the imminent hanging of a Christian woman in Sudan, as soon as her baby is weaned, i.e. when she turns two years old. The woman had to give birth while shackled, and will remain in Omdurman prison for ..... oh, just a bit under two years now."
Bit of a change of heart from you, poirot. You normally support your Islamic comrades in any of the disgusting things they do. What's happened, you wake up to yourself, or is this just because it's a woman. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 1:41:01 PM
| |
Jayb,
I was quoting Loudmouth. He was highlighting the deplorable treatment of that Sudanese woman...and berating us because we weren't discussing it on a thread about Peta Credlin and the "left". I included it here as an example of as Loudmouth's hypocrisy as he was again berating a poster for not going "BTT" - when apparently Loudmouth gives himself permission to go off topic whenever the urge appeals to him Your comment: "...You normally support your Islamic comrades in any of the disgusting things they do..." ...is mendacious. But that's exactly what I've come to expect around here. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 1:52:47 PM
| |
Seeing as the finger pointing continues about who
lied the most - the following link may be of some interest and to also jog some memories (ones not set in concrete of course). It's not from the usual NewsCorp media so of course it may be unaccetable to some - who prefer their news carefully selected: http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/is-australia-run-by-compulsive-liars-part-two-abbotts-astonishing-30-lies,6398 Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 10 June 2014 1:56:40 PM
|
"Your epithets - Tony Baloney, Mad Monk, {sooner or later] Abbott the Rabbit, &c., and your slag about his saying 'Canadia' before correcting himself (who hasn't done that sort of thing ?) are perhaps less likely to change anybody's fundamental viewpoint, except perhaps in an undergrad bar or TAFE cafeteria."
You run a nice line in hypocrisy Yes?
Try these epithets on for size...they should fit because they're yours : )
"Hi Pirrot"
" Thank you, Porrit."
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6413&page=0#190670
"Parrot..."
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6413&page=0#190372
Etc...
And..."And by the way, 'back to topic' doesn't necessarily mean 'back to part of the topic', and then some semantic sliding away from even that."
More hypocrisy....
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6413#190161
"However, and slightly off-topic, I am concerned that this topic gets so much comment compared to this simultaneous thread:"
"concerning the imminent hanging of a Christian woman in Sudan, as soon as her baby is weaned, i.e. when she turns two years old. The woman had to give birth while shackled, and will remain in Omdurman prison for ..... oh, just a bit under two years now."
Etc....