"Secular dogma of moral relativism" .. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. And you think your Flying Spaghetti Monster is any better? I wonder if He's sorry for murdering all those innocent, little Egyptian babies all those thousands of years ago?

Nhoj,

suddenly you believe in absolutes. How amazing if not a tad hypocritical.

Please explain your "version" of the meaning of "absolutes", and then please explain why you used "hypocritical". Are you capable of explaining this properly? Probably not. Let's see. I'm waiting ---

OJ/SIMPLESON../QUOTE.<<I wonder if He's sorry..for murdering all those innocent,..little Egyptian babies all those thousands of years ago?>>

WHAT HAS good is begotten....by GOD
FOR SORROW..NOR SORROR..death indeed where is thy sting?

every spirit born was told the state of spiritual decay
some jump in premature..thus fade away

your the winner of 3 million sperm racing
for that big cell to make you..that first living germ..[the beginning..of you]

NONE LIVE BUT BY GODS MERCY AND HIS GRACE ALONE*
believe it god gives us each bETTER THAN WE EVER GAVE

indeed god fore gave
thus all[even the least]..are saved
each given the bodY.THAT BEST MEETS ITS DRIVING LUSTS.{*}

NOJO/QUOTE..<<..Please explain*...your "version" of the meaning of "absolutes",>>

god is eternal
this material realm..is absoute[going on to obsolete

ob sol eat*

<<.. and then please explain why you used "hypocritical".>>

yoiur constant focus on medication indicates over stimuation
i know cause i got it in me

but i know its demons driving me
yopu just dont now its not you[someone is feeding off your passion energy emmisions[much like noct*earnal emmision

<<.. Are you capable of explaining this properly? >>

the one you pick on can explain it better
but how about you too giving thyne own reply

<<Probably not. Let's see. I'm waiting ->>

yeah me too..you think any/reply distracts your non reply away..

arewe not simply ammusing each other to clarify our stance
id love to gear if you have anything to say in a court?

just tell them your gievance and they will slot you in

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=16263&page=3

if not just come and watch me crumble
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=6293&page=10

vote none of the above*

Like Foxy I find it dissapointing that both parties have been caught out cheating to use a polite word for it.
In NSW the labour party brought in a law to ban contributions from certain types of businesses.
Fair enough as that was where the corruption came from when the Labour party was
running the show.
However they did not ban contributions from trade unions.
No surprise there, but it has put pressure onto the Liberal party in raising funds.

The latest suggestion of only individuals can make donations.
Well that has holes all through it.
eg one donation from each trade union member included in membership fee.
eg one donation from each shareholder deducted from dividend.

hmmm, you see what I mean ?

The taxpayer to pay ? Not another levy ?